Nov 042012
 

Because there must be a World’s Tallest Midget and a World’s Shortest Giant, there must also be a Stupidest Member of Mensa.

My wife Ellen says it’s me.  And it’s hard to argue.

First off, I barely graduated from Cherry Hill High on the westside of Detroit, with a 1.1 average: that’s a D+, by the way, folks. I preferred reading Mickey Spillane and SciFi paperbacks hidden behind my schoolbooks while everyone else was learning something.

Yet I did graduate. I think they just wanted me out of there.

Second off, in those long-ago days when we all received a yellow map pin from Mensa to wear as a form of covert identification, I lost three in a row. If you remember (or ever knew), those little yellow map pins were handed out so that secret geniuses could recognize each other on the playground while getting the hell beat out of them by the tough kids.

Add the sad fact that my middle name was Wellington and you’ll understand why I had to pick the roughest, toughest bullies in school to be my friends (“Judo, can you lean on the gym teacher for me? He wants me to participate!”)

Of course, my nickname back then, further indicating clear intelligence, ended up being Carp.

This name was bestowed on me by a good friend, a criminal mastermind actually, who I’ll call Dave (because that’s his name), who I believe is currently serving about a hundred years for crimes he committed when barely out of high school.

And I mean out of high school, since he was expelled the moment the shop teacher and the police paid a surprise visit to Dave’s home and discovered more of the school’s tools and equipment in his basement than were left at the actual school.

Seriously, about $10,000 worth. Of course, at least Dave was using all those tools for a good cause: to make money.

Literally.

In those long ago days, it was possible to get a regular-sized candy bar out of a machine for the miracle sum of 5 cents, a nickel. And, because those simplistic machines would also give out a nickel in change for a dime inserted, it was an easy matter for any criminal mastermind to C-clamp ten or so pennies to a work bench to grind down into fake-dimes.

Which worked just fine in the candy machines.  And gave back a nickel.

Because Dave and I were decent guys (except for his criminal mastermind status), we talked about giving all the free candy bars to less fortunate kids. It was a nice gesture, but in the end we just ate all the candy bars ourselves.

Even today, I have a slightly guilty feeling whenever I eat a Snickers bar.

Also, there were so many imprints of pennies lining the edge of the workbench returned to the school, it caused a bit of concern. And confusion. Yet no one ever figured out why.

I guess no one else in the school system at that time belonged to Mensa.

In any case, I use a lot of my long-ago weirdness and adventures in my fiction, giving it a certain edge (I’d like to think) that normal people couldn’t possibly come up with. With my youthful background, I don’t have to make up very much.

I just call it fiction and hope the statute of limitations has run out.  And I guess I should check out that statute of limitations thing on whatever I write, but I haven’t figured out how to do it yet.

I suppose my wife (who often calls me Mensa-Boy, but never in a nice way) could be right.

Anyway, if you get a chance, check out my latest book, Killing Liberty, filled with more off-beat truth than Black Mask (the Publisher) would like me to admit.

Here’s one of the links:    http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Liberty-Parker-T-Mattson/dp/160872607X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1352040830&sr=1-1&keywords=killing+liberty

 

 

Oct 092012
 

Eager to get started on Michael Robotham’s newest Joe O’Loughlin novel SAY YOU’RE SORRY, which Kirkus calls “subtle, smart, compelling and blessed with both an intelligent storyline and top-notch writing,” but can’t make it  to Murder By the Book in Houston tonight to meet Michael and hear him read? We’ve got you covered–

My name is Piper Hadley and

I went missing on the last Saturday of the summer holidays three years ago. I didn’t disappear completely and I didn’t run away, which is what a lot of people thought (those who didn’t believe I was dead). And despite what you may have heard or read, I didn’t get into a stranger’s car or run off with some sleazy pedo I met online. I wasn’t sold to Egyptian slave traders or forced to become a prostitute by a gang of Albanians or trafficked to Asia on a luxury yacht.

I’ve been here all along—not in Heaven or in Hell or that place in between whose name I can never remember because I didn’t pay attention at Sunday scripture classes. (I only went for the cake and the cordial.)

I’m not exactly sure of how many days or weeks or months I’ve been here. I tried to keep count, but I’m not very good with numbers. Completely crap, to be honest. You can ask Mr. Monroe, my old math teacher, who said he lost his hair teaching me algebra. That’s bollocks by the way. He was balder than a turtle on chemo before he ever taught me.

Anyone who follows the news will know that I didn’t disappear alone. My best friend Tash was with me. I wish she were here now. I wish she’d never squeezed through the window. I wish I had gone in her place.

When you read those stories about kids who go missing, they are always greatly loved and their parents want them back, whether it’s true or not. I’m not saying that we weren’t loved or missed, but that’s not the whole story.

Kids who blitz their exams don’t run away. Winners of beauty pageants don’t run away. Girls who date hot guys don’t run away. They’ve got a reason to stay. But what about the kids who are bullied or borderline anorexic or self-conscious about their bodies or sick of their parents fighting? There are lots of factors that might push a kid to run away and none of them are about being loved or wanted.

I don’t want to think about Tash because I know it’s going to make me upset. My handwriting is messy at the best of times, which is weird when you consider I won a handwriting competition when I was nine and they gave me a fountain pen in a fancy box that bit my finger every time I closed it.

We disappeared together, Tash and me. That was a summer of hot winds and fierce storms that came and went like, well, storms do. It was on a clear night at the end of August after the Bingham Summer Festival, when the funfair rides had fallen silent and the colored lights had been turned off.

They didn’t realize we were gone until the next morning. At first it was just our families who searched, then neighbors and friends, calling our names across playgrounds, down streets, over hedges and across the fields. As the hours mounted they phoned the police and a proper search was organized. Hundreds of people gathered on the cricket field, dividing up into teams to search the farms, forests and along the river.

By the second day there were five hundred people, police helicopters, sniffer dogs and soldiers from RAF Brize Norton. Then came the journalists with their satellite dishes and broadcast vans, parking on Bingham Green and paying locals to use their toilets. They did their reports from in front of the town clock, telling people there was nothing to report, but saying it anyway. This went on for days on every channel, every hour, because the public wanted to be kept up-to-date on the nothingness.

They called us “the Bingham Girls” and people made shrines of flowers and tied yellow ribbons to lampposts. There were balloons and soft toys and candles just like when Princess Diana died. Complete strangers were praying for us, weeping as though we belonged to them, as though we summed up the tragedies in their own lives.

We were like fairy-tale twins, like Hansel and Gretel or the babes in the wood, or the Soham girls in their matching Man United shirts. I remember the Soham girls because our school sent cards to their families saying our prayers were with them.

I don’t like those old fairy tales—the ones about children getting eaten by wolves or kidnapped by witches. At our primary school they took Hansel and Gretel off the shelves because some of the parents complained it was too scary for children. My dad called them PC Nazis and said next time they’d be saying Humpty Dumpty promoted violence against unborn chickens.

My dad isn’t famous for his sense of humor, but he does have his moments. He once made me laugh so hard I snorted tea out my nose.

As the days passed, the media storm blew through Bingham. Cameras came into our houses, up the stairs, into our bedrooms. My bra was hanging off the doorknob and there was an empty tampon box on my bedside table. They called it a typical teenager’s room because of the posters and my collection of crystals and my photo-booth portraits of my friends.

My mum would normally have gone mental about the house being so messy, but she mustn’t have felt much like cleaning up. She didn’t feel much like breathing by the look of her. Dad did most of the talking, but still came across as a man of few words, the strong silent type.

Our parents picked apart our last days, putting them together from fragments of information like those scrapbooks people make about their newborn babies. Every detail seemed important. What book I was reading: Curious Incident—for the sixth time. What DVD I last borrowed: Shaun of the Dead. If I had a boyfriend: Yeah, right!

Everyone had a story about us—even the people who never liked us. We were cheeky, fun-loving, popular, hard-working; we were straight-A students. I laughed my ass off at that one.

People put a shine on us that wasn’t there for real, making us into the angels they wanted us to be. Our mothers were decent. Our fathers were blameless. Perfect parents who didn’t deserve to be tormented like this.

Tash was the bright one and the pretty one. She knew it too. Always wearing short skirts and tight tops. Even in her school uniform she was striking, with breasts like hood ornaments that announced her arrival. They belonged to a grown woman, a lucky woman, a woman who could model bras or be draped over the bonnet of a sports car at a motor show. She lapped up the attention, rolling the waistband of her skirt to make it shorter, undoing the top button of her blouse.

At fifteen a girl’s looks are pretty fickle. Some blossom and others play the clarinet. I was skinny with freckles, a big old head of tangly black hair, a pointy chin and the eyelashes of a llama. My assets hadn’t arrived, or they’d been delivered to someone who must have prayed harder, or prayed at all.

I was built for speed rather than low-cut dresses and short skirts. Rake-thin, a runner, I was second in the nationals for my age group. My father said I was part-whippet, until I pointed out that likening me to a dog did nothing for my self-esteem. Homely, was my grandmother’s description. Bookish, said my mother. They could have said plain as a pikestaff, but I don’t know what a pikestaff looks like. Maybe I make a pikestaff look good.

Tash was an ugly duckling that blossomed into a swan, while I was the duckling who grew into a duck—a less happy ending, I know, but more realistic. Put another way, if I was an actress in a horror movie, you’d take one look at me and say, “She’s toast.” Whereas Tash would be the girl who gets her kit off in the shower and is rescued in the nick of time and lives happily ever after with the hero and his perfect teeth.

Maybe she deserved that happy ending, because real life hadn’t been such a picnic. Tash grew up in an old farmhouse half a mile from Bingham, along a narrow lane that is just wide enough for single cars or tractors. Mr. McBain rented the farm, hoping to buy it, but he could never raise the money.

I remember my mother saying the McBains were white trash, something I never really understood. A lot of people rent houses and send their kids to public schools, but that doesn’t make them any more fucked up than the rich people living in Priory Corner.

That’s where I used to live, in a house called The Old Vicarage. It used to house the vicar until the church decided it needed even more money and sold off the house and land. The streets of Priory Corner aren’t paved with gold, but our neighbors act as though they should be.

Like everyone else in town, they put up posters in their windows and stickers on their cars after we disappeared. There were candlelight vigils and special masses at St. Mark’s and prayers at school. So many prayers, I wonder how God missed hearing any of them.

You’re probably wondering how I know this stuff about the police search and the vigil. During those first few weeks George let us watch TV and read the newspapers. We were chained up in an attic room with sloping ceilings and a skylight that was stained with birdshit. The room was airless and hot beneath the tiles, but still much nicer than this place. There was a proper bed and an old TV with a coat hanger aerial and a blizzard of static on most channels.

On the third day, I saw Mum and Dad on the screen, looking like rabbits caught in a high beam. Mum wore her black pencil dress by Alexander McQueen and a dark pair of half-pumps. Tash knew the brand. I’m not very good with designer clothes. Mum was clutching a photograph. She’d found her voice and they couldn’t stop her talking.

She listed all the clothes I might have been wearing, as though I might have dropped them like breadcrumbs, leaving a trail for people to follow. Then she paused and stared at the TV cameras. A tear hovered halfway down her cheek and everyone waited for it to fall, not listening to what she said.

Mr. and Mrs. McBain were also at the news conference. Mrs. McBain hadn’t bothered about make-up… or sleeping. She had bags under her eyes and was wearing a T-shirt and an old pair of jeans.

“Like something the cat dragged in,” said Tash.

“She’s worried about you.”

“She always looks like that.”

My dad took a shaky breath, but the words came out clearly.

“Somebody out there must have seen Piper and Tash. Maybe you’re not sure or you’re protecting someone. Please think again and call the police. You can’t imagine what Piper means to us. We’re a strong family and we don’t survive well apart.”

He looked directly into the cameras. “If you took our babies, please just bring them home. Drop them off at the end of the road or leave them somewhere. They can catch a bus or a train. Let them walk away.”

Then he spoke to Tash and me.

“Piper, if you and Tash are watching. We’re coming to find you. Just hold on. We’re coming.”

Mum had panda eyes from her mascara running but still looked like a film star. Nobody poses for a photograph like she does.

“Whoever you are—we forgive you. Just send Piper and Tash home.”

My sister Phoebe was put in front of the cameras wearing her prettiest dress, standing pigeon-toed, sucking on her fingers. Mum had to prompt her.

“Come home, Piper,” she said. “We all miss you.”

Tash’s father had his arms crossed through the whole circus. He didn’t say a word until at the very end when a reporter asked, “Haven’t you got anything to say, Mr. McBain?”

He gave the reporter a death stare and unfolded his arms. Then he said, “If you still have them, let them go. If they’re dead, tell somebody where you left them.”

He folded his arms again. That was it. Two sentences.

Something tore inside Tash’s mum and she made this small, frightened animal sound, like a kitten squeaking in a box.

There were rumors about Mr. McBain after that. People asked, “Where was his emotion? Why did he suggest they were dead?”

Apparently, you’re supposed to quiver and blubber at news conferences. It’s like some unwritten law, otherwise people will think you’ve raped and murdered your daughter and her best friend.

At the end of the questions, my mother held up a photograph of Tash and me. It’s the picture that became famous, the one everyone remembers, taken by Mr. Quirk, our school photographer (he of the wandering hands and minty breath, notorious for straightening collars, brushing skirts and feeling boobs).

In the photograph Tash and I are sitting together in the front row of our class. Tash’s skirt is so short she has to keep her knees together and her hands on her lap to avoid flashing the camera. Flashing the flash, so to speak. I’m next to her with a mop of hair and a fake smile that would make Victoria Beckham proud.

That’s the photograph everybody remembers: two girls in school uniform, Piper and Tash, the Bingham Girls.

No matter what channel you switched on, you could see us, or hear our parents pleading for information. Millions of words were written in the newspapers, page after page about new developments, which weren’t really new and added up to nothing.

At the candlelight vigil Reverend Trevor led the prayers while his wife Felicity led the gossiping. She’s like a human megaphone with a huge arse and reminds me of those dippy birds that rock back and forth, putting their beaks into a glass.

She and the reverend have a son called Damian who should have a cross carved in his forehead because he belongs to the dark side. The little shit likes to creep up behind girls and flick their bra straps. He never did it to me because I’m quicker than he is and I once shoved his asthma inhaler up his nose.

There was standing room only at St. Mark’s for the vigil. They had to put loud speakers outside so people could hear the prayers and the hymns. The only thing missing were the children. Parents were so terrified of more kidnappings that they kept their little ones at home behind locked doors, safely tucked away.

That was the weekend that the grief tourists began arriving. People drove from Oxford and beyond, circling the streets. They went to the church and stared at our school and at The Old Vicarage.

They watched the reporters talking breathlessly to cameras, making nothing into something, picking the scabs off past tragedies, tossing out names like Holly Wells, Jessica Chapman and Sarah Payne, filling a few more hours with rumor and speculation.

Afterwards the tourists drove away looking slightly disappointed. They wanted Bingham to be more sinister, a place where teenagers disappeared and didn’t come home.

1

It’s freezing outside—minus twenty-six degrees in places—extraordinary for this time of year. I felt like Scott of Antarctica when I walked to work this morning across Hyde Park—O’Loughlin of the Serpentine, battling the extremes—although I looked more like a bloated contestant on Dancing on Ice.

The snow began falling four days ago, big wet flakes that melted, refroze and were covered again, stupefying traffic and silencing roads. There aren’t enough snowplows to clear motorways or council trucks to grit the streets. More grit has been needed, literally and figuratively.

Airports have been shut. Flights grounded. Vehicles abandoned. Tens of thousands of people are stranded at terminals and motorway service stations, which look like refugee camps full of the displaced and dispossessed, huddling beneath thermal blankets in a sea of silver foil.

According to the TV weather reports, a dense block of cold air is sitting over Greenland and Iceland, blocking the jet stream from the Atlantic. At the same time winds from the Arctic and Siberia have “turbo-charged” the cold because of something called an Arctic Oscillation.

Normally, I don’t mind the snow. It can hide a lot of sins. London looks beautiful under laundered sheets, like a city from a fairy tale or a sound studio. But today I need the trains to be running on time. Charlie is coming up to London and we’re going to spend four days together in Oxford. This is a father–daughter bonding weekend although she would probably call it something else.

A boy is involved. His name is Jacob.

“Couldn’t you find an Edward?” I asked Charlie. She gave me a look—the one she learned from her mother.

I don’t know much about Jacob other than his brand of underwear, which he advertises below his arse crack. He could be very nice. He may have a vocabulary. I do know that he’s five years older than Charlie, and that they were caught together in her bedroom with the door closed. Kissing, they said, although Charlie’s blouse was unbuttoned.

“You have to talk to her,” Julianne told me, “but do it gently. We don’t want to give her a complex.”

“What sort of complex could we give her?” I asked.

“We could turn her off sex.”

“That sounds like a bonus.”

Julianne didn’t find this funny. She has visions of Charlie succumbing to low self-esteem, which apparently is the first step on the slippery slope to eating disorders, rotten teeth, a bad complexion, tumbling grades, drug addiction and prostitution. I’m exaggerating of course, but at least Julianne turns to me for advice.

We’re estranged, not divorced. The subject is raised occasionally (never by me) but we haven’t got round to signing the papers. In the meantime, we share the raising of two daughters, one of them a bright, enchanting seven-year-old, the other a teenager with a smart mouth and a dozen different moods.

I moved back to London eight months ago. Sadly, I don’t see as much of the girls, which is a shame. I have almost come full circle—establishing a new clinical practice and living in north London. This is how it used to be five years ago when Julianne and I had a house on the border of Camden Town and Primrose Hill. In the summer, when the windows were open, we could hear the sound of lions and hyenas at London Zoo. It was like being on safari without the minivans.

Now I live in a one-bedroom flat that reminds me of something I had when I was at college—cheap, transitory, full of mismatched furniture and a fridge stocked with Indian pickles and chutneys.

I try not to dwell on the past. I touch it only gingerly with the barest tips of my thoughts, as though it were a worrying lump in my testis, probably benign, but lethal until proven otherwise.

I am practicing again. There is a bronze plaque on the door saying JOSEPH O’LOUGHLIN, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST, with various letters after my name. Most of my referrals are from the Crown Prosecution Service, although I work two days a week for the NHS.

So far today I have seen a cross-dressing car salesman, an obsessive-compulsive florist and a nightclub bouncer with anger management issues. None of them are particularly dangerous, simply struggling to cope.

My secretary, Bronwyn, knocks on the door. She’s an agency temp who chews gum faster than she types.

“Your two-o’clock is here,” she says. “I was wondering if I could leave early today?”

“You left early yesterday.”

“Yes.”

She departs without further discussion.

Mandy enters, aged twenty-nine, blonde and overweight, with terrible skin and eyes that should belong to an older woman. She has been sent to see me because her two children were found alone in a locked flat in Hackney. Mandy had gone clubbing with her boyfriend and slept over at his place. She told police that she felt her daughter, aged six, was old enough to look after her younger brother, four. Both children are fine, by the way. A neighbor found them fluttering like chickens over the biscuit crumbs and feces that dotted the carpet.

Mandy looks at me accusingly now, as though I’m personally responsible for her children being taken into care. For the next fifty minutes we discuss her history and I listen to her excuses. We agree to meet next week and I write up my notes.

It’s just after three. Charlie’s train arrives in half an hour and I’m going to meet her at the station. I don’t know what we’ll do in Oxford on the weekend. I’m due to talk at a mental health symposium, although I can’t imagine anyone showing up, given the weather, but the tickets have been sent (first class) and they’ve booked me into a nice hotel.

Packing my briefcase, I take my overnight bag from the cupboard and lock up the office. Bronwyn has already gone, leaving a hint of her perfume and a lump of chewing gum stuck to her mug.

At Paddington Station I look for Charlie among crowds of passengers spilling from the carriages of the First Great Western service. She’s among the last off the train. She’s talking to a boy who is pushing a mountain bike with all the nonchalance of a Ferrari driver. He’s wearing a duffel coat and is cultivating sideburns.

The boy rides away. Charlie restores a set of white earbuds to her ears. She’s wearing jeans, a baggy sweater and an overcoat left over from the German Luftwaffe.

She offers me each cheek to kiss and then leans into a hug.

“Who was that?”

“Just a guy.”

“Where did you meet him?”

“On the train.”

“What was his name?”

She stops me. “Is this going to be twenty questions, Dad, because I didn’t take notes. Was I supposed to take notes? You should have warned me. I could have written you a full report.”

The sarcasm she inherited from her mother, or maybe they teach it at that private school that costs me so much money.

“I was just making conversation.”

Charlie shrugs. “His name is Christian, he’s eighteen, he comes from Bristol and he’s going to be a doctor—a pediatrician to be exact—and he thinks he might work in the Third World for a while, but he’s not my type.”

“You have a type?”

“Yep.”

“May I ask what your type is?”

She sighs, weary of explaining things. “No girl my age should ever date a boy her parents would approve of.”

“Is that a rule?”

“Yep.”

I take her bag and check the departures board. Our train to Oxford leaves in forty minutes.

“So is there any news I should know about? Any latest developments?”

“Nope.”

“How’s school?”

“Good.”

“Emma?”

“She’s fine.”

I’m interrogating her again. Charlie isn’t a talker. Her baseline demeanor is too-cool-to-care.

We buy sandwiches in plastic triangles and soft drinks in plastic bottles. Charlie puts her headphones back in her ears so I can hear the fuzzy thunga-thunga-twang as we board the train and sit opposite each other.

She has dyed her hair since I saw her last and has an annoying fringe that falls over her eyes. I worry about her. She frowns too often. For some reason she seems compelled to figure out life too early, long before she has the equipment.

The train leaves on time and we pass out of London, the wheels playing a jazz percussion beneath my feet. Houses give way to fields—a landscape frozen into still life, where the only signs of life are smudges of smoke rising from chimneys or the headlights of cars waiting at crossings.

A couple are kissing in the seats across the aisle, locked together. Her leg is pressed between his thighs.

“That’s disgusting,” says Charlie.

“They’re just kissing.”

“I can hear suction.”

“It’s a public place.”

“They should get a room.”

I glance at the couple again and feel a Pavlovian twinge of arousal or nostalgia. The girl is young and pretty. She reminds me of Julianne at the same age. Being in love. Belonging to someone.

Just outside of Oxford, the train slows and stops. The wheels creak forward periodically and then shudder to a standstill. Charlie presses her hand against the carriage window and watches a long line of men move across a snowy field, bent at the waist, as though pulling invisible plows.

“Have they lost something?”

“I don’t know.”

The train nudges forward again. Through the sleet-streaked window I see a police car bogged axle deep in snow on a farm track. A muddy Land Rover is parked on the nearby embankment. A circle of men, figures in white, are erecting a canvas tent at the edge of a lake. Spreading a domed arch over the spars, they fight against the wind, which makes the canvas flap and snap until pegs are driven into the frozen earth and ropes are pulled tight.

As the train edges past, I see what they’re trying to shield. At first it looks like cast-off clothing or a dead animal, but then I recognize the human shape: a body, trapped beneath the ice like an insect locked in clear amber.

Charlie sees it too.

“Was there some sort of accident?”

“Looks like it.”

“Did they fall from a train?”

“I don’t know.”

Charlie presses her forehead to the glass.

“Maybe you shouldn’t look,” I say. “You might have nightmares.”

“I’m not six.”

The train shudders and picks up speed again. Snow swirls like confetti from the roof. For a brief moment, the world has tilted out of true and I feel a sense of growing disquiet. There is a void in the world… somebody not coming home.

Oct 032012
 

I have mixed feelings about this preview trailer for the upcoming film, Parker, based on the Richard Stark (Donald Westlake) books. I've been a bit wary about Jason Statham's casting ever since I first heard about the project - we all know that I love Statham as an action star, but I suspected from the beginning that the filmmakers would end up adapting the character to his established film persona, rather than get him to play the Parker of the books.

Based on this trailer, it appears that I was right.

The opening scenes of the heist and double-cross certainly have a Stark/Westlake flavor, but the rest of the trailer plays out like every other Statham star vehicle. Which means I'll probably enjoy it as an action movie... but as an adaptation of Stark/Westlake? Probably not so much.

Still, it's only the first trailer, and it may simply be a marketing choice (and probably the correct one) to try and make it appeal to the legions of Statham fans who probably don't have the foggiest idea of who the character Parker is.

I'll try and keep an open mind....

I do love the poster, though. Nice, clean, striking design.

Sep 272012
 

Books to Die For, a collection of 120 of the most influential living writers of crime and suspense discussing their favorite works, edited by John Connolly and Declan Burke, will be available this Tuesday, October 2nd.  We may not be publishing it ourselves, but we’re sure as hell excited about it–which is why we’re featuring Jo Nesbo’s essay today on Jim Thompson’s Pop. 1280, available as a Mulholland e-book for $4.99.

Dubbed the “Dimestore Dostoevsky” by novelist Geoffrey O’Brien, Jim Thompson (1906–77) published more than thirty novels during his career. Despite early critical praise, and particularly positive reviews from Anthony Boucher in the New York Times, Thompson’s talent went largely unrecognized during his lifetime. He made his debut in 1942 with Now and On Earth, and is best known for novels such as The Killer Inside Me (1952), Savage Night (1953), A Hell of a Woman (1954), The Getaway (1958), and The Grifters (1963), all of which were characteristic of an oeuvre that unflinchingly explored the darkest and nastiest recesses of the human psyche. “He let himself see everything, he let himself write it down, then he let himself publish it,” declared Stephen King. Well served by film adaptations, and particularly French filmmakers, Thompson’s The Killer Inside Me was remade in 2010, directed by Michael Winterbottom and starring Casey Affleck.

There’s a clip in the Sylvester Stallone film, Cop Land. The clip only lasts about one or two seconds, and doesn’t have much to do with the rest of the film. It’s a brief flash of a sign showing the number of inhabitants in the town. The sign says, “Pop. 1280.”

I looked around the cinema when it came on the screen, and listened. No reaction. Obviously. Because it was 1997 and this was a coded mes- sage for the initiated few, a bonus for those who had dived into the deep- est depths of pulp literature and found Jim Thompson, the genius who portrayed the American psychopath in the first person some forty years before Brett Easton Ellis did the same in American Psycho.

I personally hadn’t had to dive so deep myself. I was served Jim Thompson on a silver platter by a friend, Espen, who told me it was “old, but good stuff.” The book had the very promising title of Pop. 1280 and a not-quite-so-promising sheriff on the cover. And maybe that was the only way to discover Jim Thompson: you had to be guided to him by someone like Espen, someone who moved freely beyond the main highways and narrow paths of literary snobbery.

Because Jim Thompson is not to be found in any best-seller list or serious literary publication; he was neither the talk of the town nor a cult phenomenon. Jim Thompson died in 1977, but by then, in a way, he had already been dead a long time. Written off, labeled as a mediocre crime writer who, by the end of his seventy-year life, had destroyed any credibility he might still have enjoyed by writing bad books with one aim in mind: to give the readers what he thought they wanted, so that he could earn enough money to cover his rent, medical expenses, and alcohol consumption. He had betrayed his own talent and his real fans, and undermined any possibility of ever being taken seriously again. There weren’t many who saw a reason to go to Jim Thompson’s funeral. Fewer still actually turned up, due to a printing error in his death notice. It was like the final chapter of a Jim Thompson novel.

Then in 1984, Black Lizard Press started to print Jim Thompson again. And it was one of these paperbacks that Espen gave me.

I read. Opened my eyes. And understood.

I then proceeded to read the rest of Thompson’s work—not every single line and page, but the best and most important books, because I quickly learned that it was necessary to separate the wheat from the chaff. At his best, Jim Thompson was fantastic. At his worst, he was therefore all the more remarkably bad. How could the author who had written Savage Night, Hell of a Woman, and The Grifters also write The Rip-Off ? (Given the limited attention that Jim Thompson has received in Norway, it is unbelievable that this particular book has been translated into Norwegian (Bløffen, published by Cappelen), but read it and compare it to the rest if you want to see just how much an author’s production can vary, in terms of quality!)

The answer lies possibly in Jim Thompson’s desperate consumption of alcohol and the associated deterioration in his health. For here was a candle that burned at both ends, and—I’m taking a chance here as Jim Thompson never denied himself a dodgy metaphor—that is precisely why it burned so bright. So brightly, in fact, that between 1952 and 1954, in the space of just eighteen months, he wrote twelve novels, including some of his very best. Following this eruption of creativity, the gaps between each book, and between the high points in his writing, got longer, whereas the periods between his excessive drinking and his stints in the hospital grew shorter. Pop. 1280, which he wrote in 1964, was his last great work. He returned to the figure of the bad sheriff (Nick Corey), the same figure with which he started out in 1952 when he introduced Lou Ford in The Killer Inside Me.

And after that, it was over: the decline had started, before he ever managed to become the Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett that he could have been. And yet, on his deathbed, he said to his wife: “Just wait, I’ll be famous within ten years of my death.” I think we can answer that statement with Sheriff Nick Corey’s mantra: “I wouldn’t say you was wrong, but I sure wouldn’t say you was right, either.”

But in my book, Jim Thompson is still the greatest crime writer. And so I can only say to you what Espen said to me back then when he handed me that copy of Pop. 1280: “I envy you, because you still haven’t read this.”

Jo Nesbø is a Norwegian author best known for his police procedurals featuring Detective Harry Hole. He made his debut in 1997 with Flaggermusmannen ( The Bat), although the first of his novels to be translated into English was Marekors (2003), published in translation as The Devil’s Star (2005). In total there are nine Harry Hole novels, the most recent of which is Phantom (2012). A film adapted from his stand-alone novel Hodejegerne (2008), aka Headhunters (2011), was released in 2012. Nesbø has won a slew of literary prizes in Scandinavia, including Best Norwegian Crime Novel Ever Written for The Redbreast in 2004.

John Connolly is the author of such international bestsellers as The Whisperers, The Gates, The Lovers, The Reapers, The Unquiet, The Black Angel, Every Dead Thing, Dark Hollow, The Killing Kind, The Book of Lost Things, and Bad Men.  His 11th Charlie Parker novel, The Wrath of Angels, was published in August in the UK and Ireland, and will be out in the US on January 1, 2013. He is also the host of the weekly radio show ABC to XTC.  He divides his time between Dublin, Ireland and Portland, Maine.

Declan Burke is the author of Eightball Boogie, The Big O, Absolute Zero Cool and the recently-released Slaughter’s Hound.  He is also the editor of Down These Green Streets: Irish Crime Writing in the 21st Century.  He lives in Wicklow with his wife Aileen and baby daughter Lily, and hosts a website dedicated to Irish crime fiction called Crime Always Pays.

Sep 262012
 

 

What a choice. But a valid one.

In 2011, approximately 350 studio and independent films were produced and distributed from original screenplays in the United States, although well over 50,000 new screenplays were registered with the Writers Guild that year.

Some claim the number’s closer to 100,000, but the Guild isn’t saying.

And that same number of new scripts (50,000 to 100,000!) were registered every year before that. And will continue being registered, every year, year after year, after that.  Quite a pile.

Making for some pretty long odds.

In the book world, over 300,000 books were published in the U.S. in 2011, although a few sites are quoting a much higher number. In any case, the odds of getting a book published far exceed the likelihood of having a film company put up $30 million or so to produce even a low-to-mid-budget version of a writer’s first screenplay.

That said, and having only a few scripts produced (Darkroom, a piece of crap horror film, was my first written, in Syd Field’s screenwriting class), and a few other scripts optioned, I’ve discovered it’s far more fun (and profitable) to write a novel and have it published within a matter of months.

Compared to spending years waiting for an optioned screenplay to get produced. Even those screenplays optioned by well-meaning, well-connected and otherwise successful movie producers.

Supposedly, the average time span from writing a screenplay to seeing it on the big screen for an already-produced screenwriter is eight (8!) years.

In other words, that new BMW you bought with your option money will be over by the time the picture gets made, far too weird/clunky to park anywhere near the premiere where anyone can see you crawling out of it.

The Writer! It’s Him! Holy crap, look at that piece of shit he’s driving! What a loser! Did his mom buy him that thing when he was still in school or what?!

Yes, in Hollywood, believe it or not, like it or not, hate it or not, what you drive is who you are. Absolutely true. So scrape together your last few dollars to rent a new Bentley for the damn night. That is, if you even get invited to your own movie premiere. For reference on how nicely screenwriters are treated, see Robert Altman’s The Player.

In any case, another choice emerges: convert your movie scripts into novels.

If your book version does get published, you’ll already have the screenplay ready to go (even though they’ll pay you to get lost and will instead hire the hot young writer who already has a three-picture studio deal).

Anyway, after my first crime novel, Killing Liberty, was published by the great people at Black Mask, and before I finish Killing Time, the second book in the five-book Derek Raiford series Black Mask asked for, I’ve decided to quickly turn my favorite unproduced screenplay, Interception City, into a crime novel. Also to be written as Parker T. Mattson.

How hard could it be?

Admittedly, it’s been a frustrating adventure trying to get it made. As a racially-charged murder & mayhem thriller taking place in a terrible little shithole city buried deep in the Florida Everglades, it’s been called too much of a hot potato by more than one Hollywood movie producer.

One dashing young movie producer’s father, an older Academy Award-winning screenwriter living abroad, read the script and called it great fun, suggesting his son option it. Nothing much happened but it was very exciting for several long months.

Next.

A successful director I know read Interception City on a cross-country flight and told me the premise was far too dark, even with the snappy and fun dialogue I’d provided, to interest him. Six months later he called to say he did want to direct it, after a second read, but thought financing would be difficult.

I’ll say.

For those of you older folks, think In The Heat Of The Night meets any thriller taking place in a terrible little shithole city buried deep in the Florida Everglades.

Friend Michael Winslow (sound effects wizard Larvell Jones in all the Police Academy movies) said it was a great read (fun, too) but too controversial to be produced as a movie without a book first proving its commercial appeal.

I reluctantly agreed.

But (as always with such critiques that require further effort) in response I simply hid the script in my underwear drawer so it’d eventually be found (and produced, to great critical acclaim and shocking financial success) long after I died.

That’s how it works, folks – ask Phillip K. Dick.

Anyway,  here goes: turning your own screenplay into a book. It can’t take much time, right? Maybe three weeks, then back to finish Killing Time.

I mean, the hard work on Interception City’s already been done, long months of writing it in Key West between long afternoons of poolside drinking, spicy shrimp at A&B Lobster House and general frolicking until 4:00AM. After all, the story’s there. The characters are there. The dialogue, of course, is there (that’s mainly what a screenplay is, after all, plus some minimal stage directions).

I’ll just throw in a few descriptions of trees, cars, sky, swamps, rooms, dead bodies, etc., etc., etc., and it should be ready to go.

Consider it an experiment. And I’ll definitely let you know…

BTW, and again, Killing Liberty is getting some decent reader reviews, even by people I’ve never met or heard of (really), plus it will be soon reviewed by The Key West Citizen’s Solares Hill section.

I’m hoping for the best.

http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Liberty-ebook/dp/B008LMI6PK/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1348672188&sr=1-1

 

Sep 242012
 

Oceans, hearts and ghosts.Twenty-eight years ago, a young mother disappeared from her home in Sydney’s northern suburbs, leaving behind two daughters and a handsome football star husband.

 Lynette Dawson, a nurse and childcare worker, has never been seen since, but the mystery of her fate continues to haunt her family, friends and neighbours. It also provided the seed for bestselling author Michael Robotham’s thriller, BLEED FOR ME, now available in paperback in bookstores everywhere. Here, he explains how …

I was a young journalist working for an afternoon newspaper in Sydney when Lynette Dawson disappeared in January 1982. It didn’t make the headlines or cause a ripple of publicity, because nobody reported her missing at first.

Her husband, Chris Dawson, was a PE teacher at Cromer High School, on Sydney’s northern beaches. He was also a champion rugby league star for the Newtown Jets, playing alongside his identical twin brother Paul, who coincidentally taught at the same high school.

Former students say they were the coolest, most popular teachers and parents remember them as being incredibly charming and handsome. Both men had done modelling work and moved on to play rugby union.

According to his police statement, Chris Dawson dropped Lynette off at Mona Vale shopping centre on the morning of January 9, 1982. She had organized to meet her mother at Northbridge Baths that day, but didn’t show up.

Chris called his mother-in-law and said that Lynette ‘needed some time on her own’ and had gone off for a few days. On that same day he also called his 16-year-old lover, Joanne Curtis, and said, ‘My wife has gone away. She’s not coming back.’

Joanne was a student at Cromer High and also the Dawson’s regular babysitter. She moved into the family’s Bayview home and began looking after Lynette’s daughters. Meanwhile Lynette’s family waited to hear from her but Chris seemed to be the only person she was calling.

Three weeks later, Lynette’s eldest daughter started school. She wasn’t there. She hadn’t called. After three more weeks, Chris Dawson finally reported her missing.

There should have been a police investigation. There wasn’t. Instead Lynette became just another missing person, one of hundreds who slip through the cracks every year and vanish.

In 1983 Chris Dawson filed for divorce and a year later married his schoolgirl lover. They left Sydney to live in Queensland, selling the house in Bayview and escaping the whispers and rumours that surrounded their relationship.

This story might have ended there, which would have been a bigger tragedy, but no less a mystery. In 1990 Chris Dawson’s second marriage broke down and Joanne returned to Sydney with a daughter that she had by him. She contacted Lynette’s family via a social worker and volunteered information to the police.

She described how she was groomed and seduced by Chris Dawson while still at school and how she had sex with him in the family home while his wife slept upstairs. She also revealed how a month before Lynette disappeared Chris had talked about hiring a hit man to ‘get rid of her’.

Despite her statement, the police still didn’t launch an investigation. It wasn’t until 1997 – fifteen years after Lynette disappeared – that a full inquiry was launched. By then the only physical records were a piece of paper with Lynette Dawson’s name on it and her missing persons file number.

The detective who took charge, Sgt Damian Loone, had to place a story in the local paper, asking for people to come forward. The response was remarkable. In the months that followed, the pool and patio area of the Bayview house was excavated and a pink cardigan was sent to America for mitochondrial DNA testing. It also emerged that Chris Dawson had returned to the house in Bayview three times and asked the new owners if he could look in the back yard because ‘it meant a lot to him…’

In 2001, police presented a case to the NSW coroner. Within a day, the inquest had been terminated and the recommendation made that a ‘known person’ be charged with Lynette’s murder.

It was then up to the DPP, the Department of Public Prosecution, to decide. After nine months the ruling came back that the evidence was insufficient to proceed.

In February 2003 there was a full hearing at Westmead Coroner’s Court. Over five days of evidence from numerous witnesses, a picture emerged of Chris Dawson as a serial groomer of schoolgirls. His activities included sharing girls with his brother and instigating encounters where both men slept with Joanne Curtis when she was still 16.

Chris Dawson refused to give evidence at the inquest but have always denied any involvement in his wife’s disappearance.

On February 28, 2003, a second coroner found that Lynette Dawson was deceased and again recommended that a ‘known person’ be charged with her murder. Again the DPP announced there was ‘insufficient evidence to support any criminal charge against any person’.

I have never met Chris Dawson. I could pass him in the street or sit beside him in the cinema and be none the wiser. I know he lives in Queensland and has retired from teaching. I don’t know what happened to Lynette Dawson, but the police suspect that she was murdered some time between January 8 and January 9 in 1982

Most novelists draw their material from real-life events, crime writers even more so. When I began researching my novel, BLEED FOR ME, I wanted to create the character of a handsome, charismatic schoolteacher who is a favourite among students and parents; someone who everybody loved and nobody doubted.

a school for girlsThrough the strange twist of fortune or fate that brings a writer together with an idea, I came across the story of Lynette Dawson and realized that I had the seeds of a story. BLEED FOR ME is pure fiction, yet seeded with an emotional truth.

At one point in the narrative there is a conversation in which the schoolteacher explains that the process of teaching is also one of seduction – it’s about creating an interest and a passion where none previously existed. It’s about getting students to want something they didn’t know they wanted.

‘Students get crushes not because they want to be with me but because they wanted to be like me. I bring out their best. I make them feel special. It is a meeting of minds.’

I don’t know who killed Lynette Dawson, but I do know that Chris Dawson remains the prime suspect.

But I haven’t written her story…just as I haven’t written his. The fate of Lynette Dawson was the seed, not the inspiration for BLEED FOR ME. No crime should ever inspire anyone, let alone a novelist.

Instead I took the idea and changed the setting to England instead of Australia. And I begin my novel with a murder – the death of a celebrated detective, found with his throat cut on the floor of his daughter’s bedroom. Meanwhile his daughter, Sienna, covered in her father’s blood, turns up at a nearby house, traumatized and unable to speak.

By setting the story in a small village, I want to reveal how a single dramatic event can ripple through a family, a neighborhood, a community and a nation, until it touches every one of us and evokes our common humanity.

Michael Robotham is a former investigative journalist turned thriller writer. His latest novel BLEED FOR ME is in bookstores now. You can read more at www.michaelrobotham.com

Sep 122012
 

Robert W. Fisher

My next crime thriller to be published by Black Mask, Killing Time, will take place in Key West, Florida, otherwise called The Conch Republic. For those who don’t know, Key West is a small dot of coral (less than 4 miles long by 1½ miles wide) located 154 miles out in the Gulf of Mexico.

It’s the southern point of the contiguous United States, at the far end of a single road called U.S. Route 1. It’s also closer to Cuba than Miami, across only 94 miles of exceptionally warm ocean from Havana.

The weather, not surprisingly, is always perfect.

And the drive is gorgeous, through a string of narrow tropical islands and along many causeways, where the clearest water possible turns gradually from green to pure turquoise well before ending at Mile Marker 0 at Fleming Street and Whitehead.

Like Killing Liberty, my first crime novel, Killing Time will feature tough ex-Detroit PD homicide detective Derek Raiford. And, of course (much as Roland The Headless Thompson Gunner spent his days), Derek’s crime-stopping adventures will keep him knee deep in gore.

Yet he’ll still have time to enjoy Key West. As it should be enjoyed.

Although we’re currently living back in mid-Michigan, my wife Ellen and I will always consider Key West to be our adopted home; adopted because only folks whose families have lived there for a hundred years or so are thought of as true Conchs: the genuine natives of Key West.

Seven generations are about average for a Conch. The rest of us were newcomers, even after years. Freshwater Conchs, we were called.

Fair enough. But newcomers or not, we’ll take that particular island paradise as our home-away-from-home and love it as if we were genuine Conchs ourselves.  And we’ll get back there as often as we can, even spending entire months there during the winters.

Anyway, here’s the Key West we know:

It’s a drinker’s town – the well-known phrase ‘Come to Key West on vacation, leave on probation’  is mostly true. The numerous bars (over 200!) are open until 4:00 AM, close for two hours to clean up the mess, then reopen at 6:00 AM for those needing that morning gulp of rum.

I had my first-ever martini (classic gin with a touch of vermouth, stirred not shaken, blue cheese stuffed olives, mostly out of writer’s curiosity) at the fantastic Café Marquesa on the corner of Fleming & Simonton Streets. It was a huge perfect concoction with a ‘sidecar.’  I did not get right back into our 20-year-old Jeep Wrangler, instead managing to walk (stumble) around the island for two hours before driving home again.

I mostly couldn’t feel my face; but no DUI’s for either of us yet.

A couple of years ago the young son of a friend arrived in Key West for a job managing one of the many raucous clubs on Duval Street, only to get two DUI’s within one week. Both of them on his motor scooter.

He quickly returned to Michigan.

It’s an adult town – anyone naïve enough to bring their young children on vacation does so only once. The few parents walking with kids on Duvall Street are constantly putting their hands in front of the kids’ eyes, shielding them from much of the activity. This includes the windows of the many tee-shirt shops with numerous funny (dirty!) tee-shirts in full view.

Mom says, “Fuck you!” is still popular.

It’s a wild party townFantasy Fest (ten days leading up to Halloween in October) features public nudity and near-nudity. Most of the women and girls, visitors and locals both, paint on their bathing suits before parading around the streets. Thousands of them! It’s glorious, to say the least, and often makes Mardi Gras seem like an elementary school outing.

The Garden of Eden, the clothing-optional hangout on the roof of the Bull & Whistle Bar (a three-story open-air rock n’ roll palace on Duvall Street that goes day and night), has the occasional naked reveler hanging off the side and waving to the crowds below.

Sometimes wagging instead of waving. Sooner or later, though, there has a be a naked dead guy or girl ending up in the street. So far, no.

It’s a pirate town – always was and always will be, making it a perfect place to set a crime novel. Stories too numerous to even mention easily fill evenings of socializing or people-watching at places like Sloppy Joe’s, The Half-Shell Raw Bar, the Green Parrot, Captain Tony’s or any of the others.

People (good, bad and sometimes very bad) routinely run to Key West to start over and to get away from their old lives. Last names are always optional and never asked. It’s a perfect place to make a getaway. Or to use as a hideout.

But, to me, most importantly:

It’s a writers’ town – more Pulitzer Prize-winners have lived in Key West, per capita, than any other city. The Key West Library is first rate and features many books by both past and present Key West denizens. Book signings by well-known authors are routine at the excellent Key West Island Book Store.

And obviously, everyone knows that Ernest Hemingway, Tennessee Williams, John Dos Passos, Robert Frost, Randy Wayne White, James W. Hall, Tim Dorsey and a hundred other successful writers lived there, worked there and/or simply wrote there.

Again, it’s the writers’ town.

Hopefully, one day, we’ll move back permanently. If so, feel free to keep in touch if you ever want to visit. We do know our way around Key West.

And we enjoy company.

By the way, the printed version of Killing Liberty, as well as the Kindle edition, is now available on Amazon.  Here’s the link: http://www.amazon.com/Killing-Liberty-ebook/dp/B008LMI6PK/ref=tmm_kin_title_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1347474896&sr=1-1

 

 

 

 

 

Sep 122012
 

The e-book Jim Thompson’s THE KILLER INSIDE ME, the novel Stanley Kubrick deemed “probably the most chilling and believable first-person story of a criminally warped mind I have ever encountered,” is on sale for just $2.99 for the Nook, Kindle, and the iBookstore. Now is the perfect time to introduce yourself to one of the great classics of twentieth century crime fiction–at a bargain price, and including an intro from Stephen King.

Looking for even more of an introduction? Check out the below essay on Thompson from our very own Joe R. Lansdale.

Jim Thompson has been called a dime store Dostoevsky, but an oil field Faulkner might be more accurate. He wrote not only about the common man, he wrote like the common man, with words full of raw truth mixed with sweet and sticky lies; wicked stories written with a glass of whisky at his elbow.

I had never heard of Jim Thompson growing up. And this surprises me. I read all manner of novels by all manner of writers, and a writer like Thompson was just my meat, but it wasn’t until Stephen King commented on him, that he hit my radar.

Not long after that, I saw Thompson’s work everywhere, and I dove in. As a fellow Texan, same as a I had with the work of Robert E. Howard, another Texan, I recognized people I knew. Howard gussied them up in loin cloths and gave them swords, made them melancholy heroes, but Thompson’s characters were contemporary, and though melancholy for the most part, were considerably short on heroics. They were the dregs of society; little people with dreams too large for them to hold; dreams they drove all over the highways of their ambitions like a drunk at the wheel of a muscle car with bad tires.

There is no one quite like Thompson in low or high literature. He was his own man, and stories like THE KILLER INSIDE ME, THE GRIFTERS, and, well pretty much everything he ever wrote, are as unique as the pattern of a snow flake. They are his snow flakes, and they are soiled and stink of cheap liquor, but you will find no other like him. Many have tried to imitate him, but have only brought the literary equivalent of loud horns and dirty laundry to the game.

Thompson was his own man. Sad and dark, oozing rotten sex and rotten dreams, all of it touched with a kind cheap carnival atmosphere; the kind where the bolts on the rides shake and it‘s best to keep your hand on your wallet. A writer primarily confined to the literary back alleys of cheap paperbacks written in bursts as dynamic as the spewing of an oil gusher.

He was, for better or worse, the great and unique, Jim Thompson.

Joe R. Lansdale

Nacogdoches, Texas

Joe R. Lansdale is the author of more than a dozen novels, including THE BOTTOMS, A FINE DARK LINE, and LEATHER MAIDEN. He has received the British Fantasy Award, the American Mystery Award, the Edgar Award, the Grinzane Cavour Prize for Literature, and eight Bram Stoker Awards. He lives with his family in Nacogdoches, Texas. Mulholland Books will publish his next novel, EDGE OF DARK WATER, in March 2012.

Over the next year, Mulholland Books will be publishing Jim Thompson’s entire body of work in e-book format for the first time. THE KILLER INSIDE ME, THE GRIFTERS, AFTER DARK, MY SWEET, A SWELL-LOOKING BABE and THE NOTHING MAN are now available–look for the next batch on Christmas Day.

Aug 292012
 

by Gar Anthony Haywood

As the father of four children (two sets --- one now in their twenties and the other in their pre-teens), I've seen a lot of so-called "family-friendly" movies.  Some of them good and some of them bad.  A few have been terrific and quite a number have been just dreadful.

But I don't think I've ever seen a "kids'" movie as jaw-droppingly awful as THE ODD LIFE OF TIMOTHY GREEN.

Now usually, when an adult says something this harsh about a kids' movie, it's because the critic in question is just a curmudgeon.  A grown-up who's lost touch with his inner-child and can no longer be moved emotionally by films filled with pathos and/or whimsy.   I know people like this myself and I've always felt sorry for them.  What does it say about one's adult existence if you lack the capacity to feel something --- really feel something --- when E.T. boards that spaceship and leaves poor Elliott behind?

But in this case, I promise you, my unequivocal statement that THE ODD LIFE OF TIMOTHY GREEN is one of the worst kids' movies ever made, is not coming from a heartless grinch with no appreciation for flights of fancy.  In fact, it is coming from someone who had hoped it would be a fine entertainment.  My family and I saw the film three weeks ago at the behest of my son Jackson, whose birthday we were celebrating, so I truly wanted to enjoy it.

But I just couldn't.

By now, you have to be wondering just what THE ODD LIFE could have possibly done so poorly as to earn such enmity from a big, old softie like me --- someone who cries like a baby every time the credits roll at the end of BIG FISH?

The answer's quite simple: There is not a single credible moment in the film.  Not one.  No character ever --- ever --- behaves the way a real person would.

I swear to you, this is no exaggeration.

"But, wait a minute, Gar," I can hear you saying.  "This is a movie about a little boy who sprouts from a garden in answer to a childless couple's prayers.  It's a fantasy, and fantasies aren't supposed to be credible!"

To which I reply, "Nonsense."

The best fantasies are those that are well grounded in reality.  The magic in them works because, in the world in which they operate, characters abide by the very same rules of logic we do.  Fantastic things may happen to them, things that are realistically impossible, but their reactions to these things ring true.  Credibility is the lifeline a filmgoer --- or reader --- can cling to when everything else in a story is threatening to throw them overboard.  (Or worse, insisting that they jump.)

THE ODD LIFE OF TIMOTHY GREEN literally defies you at every turn to believe what its characters are doing.  When all common sense suggests they turn right, they turn left instead.

You want examples?  I could give you several dozen.  But dismantling, piece by piece, a film like this --- one that so clearly has its heart in the right place --- would be a very mean spirited thing to do.  So I'll just let one key example suffice for all the rest.

(SPOILERS AHEAD)

The film's story is told in flashback by Cindy and Jim Green, two wild and crazy kids madly in love but unable to conceive, as they are interviewed by a pair of sober and skeptical adoption agency officials.  To illustrate how fit and well-prepared they are to become adoptive parents, the Greens tell the officials the incredible tale of their "son" Timothy: a ten year old boy they raised as their own after he unexpectedly sprang from their front garden one night like an overgrown, ambulatory carrot.

Only hours before, Cindy and Jim had buried their extensive wish list for the child they can never have in a box out in the garden, and they understood immediately that Timothy --- sweet and innocent and brimming with heartwarming bromides --- was meant to be that wish list personified.  With living green leaves sprouting from his shins to authenticate his agricultural origins, Timothy had to be a gift from . . . Somebody.  Right?  So they kept him, and passed him off to everyone in Stanleyville as their own (adopted?  inherited?  borrowed?) child.

(The folks of Stanleyville are a simple and uncurious lot, apparently.)

Anyway, from there, the Greens' story gets much more preposterous --- and far more sappy.  In the end, after having changed the lives of everyone he's come in contact with for the better, Timothy loses his leaves and eventually returns to the garden, never to be seen again.  The interview comes to a close and the adoption agency officials bid the Greens farewell, having just heard them relate a story only slightly more fantastic than that of James and the Giant Peach as if they'd been under oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help them God.

Naturally, Cindy and Jim's application for adoption is approved and a beautiful little girl is promptly delivered at their doorstep, just in time for Fade Out.

That THE ODD LIFE OF TIMOTHY GREEN had to end on this cheerful note, or one remarkably similar to it, is inarguable.  This is a Disney movie, after all, and happy endings go with the territory.  I love happy endings.  But a happy ending slapped onto the backside of a film with zero effort made to support it with so much as a wisp of realism is an insult to one's intelligence.  In this case, THE ODD LIFE ends the way it does for one reason, and one reason only: because that ending suited the man who wrote and directed it.

That's what's wrong with the movie throughout: Everything that happens in it only seems to happen because the movie's screenwriter/director Peter Hedges wanted it that way.  Logic, realism, common sense --- none of these things plays any part in the choices the film's characters make.  Not in the things they say, not in the things they do.

(I suspect I'll be encouraged to offer further examples of this in the comments that follow, should you be interested in hearing them.  But I won't go into them here.)

I don't know whether THE ODD LIFE is as horrible as it is because Hedges is lazy ("I don't feel like explaining how this could happen.") or just plain clueless ("I can't explain how this could happen.").  But I do know his film comes off as the work of a man who cares far more about the emotional responses he wants to elicit from people than how those reponses can be earned honestly.  When a writer, simply to achieve a desired result, puts his own best interests before those of his characters, he is doomed to fail.  In successful fiction, the Cardinal Rule is not "For every action there must be an equal and opposite reaction" --- it's "For every action, there must be a viable and perceptible reason for the reader (or viewer) to believe it."

Defenders of THE ODD LIFE OF TIMOTHY GREEN --- and there are many, like these two little guys . . .

. . . would probably say the problems I cite are all in my head, that I just didn't approach the film with the proper commitment to suspending my disbelief.  But demanding that your audience suspend its disbelief indefinitely, simply because the story you are telling is a fairy tale, is not a substitute for telling it in such a way that it requires as little suspension of disbelief as possible.  I saw no evidence that the makers of THE ODD LIFE gave a rat's ass how credible its people and situations were, and that's a shame.

Because I like a good, child-friendly fantasy as much as the next heartless bastard.

Questions for the Class: How important is credibility in fiction to you?  What was the last critically-acclaimed film or book that failed to meet your standards in that department, and why?

Aug 272012
 


From today’s New York Times interview with Tana French: “The idea came to Ms. French one evening when she saw a strange black shape scuttering across her kitchen counter and could not, at first, convince her partner that it was real. (It turned out to be a mouse.) “What if it was happening while your relationship was already under strain, if you keep hearing this thing, and your other half questions your sense of reality?” she asked”

Switch to our mobile site