Apr 302013
 
Regular readers of this blog know I like to search for and interview writers of PI fiction (official or unofficial private eyes) who you might not now but might enjoy. I found Michael Beck, whose Mark Tanner series sounds like great reading for fans of Harlan Coben's Myron Bolitar...

Q: What makes Mark Tanner different from other hardboiled characters?
Tanner’s childhood tragedy gives him a unique focus. His tragic past and the mystery surrounding it helps define his being and life. Tanner, unlike many famous characters, is not indestructible, super-smart and always right. In fact, he probably has more faults than admirable traits. He is capricious and rude. He is violent yet emotionally vulnerable. He can be ruthless and merciless yet he baby sits his nieces. Personally, he is afraid of commitment yet, conversely, he has committed his whole life to one purpose. 

Q: How did you come up with the character?
I have always enjoyed characters with an irreverent and sardonic view of the world. I am a self-confessed sports-nut so basing Tanner’s exploits around the sporting-world and making him a Fitness Trainer was a no-brainer. I wanted to create a character that I would like to read about. A person with admirable character traits but with flaws like a real person.  I enjoy reading books where the characters display a dry humour so I wanted to create a character who displayed these qualities. 

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
I think it is great for both writers and readers alike. More budding writers than ever before have a chance of getting their work published. There are so many great writers out there that we never would have heard of if it wasn’t for the eBook revolution. And for people who love books they are now more accessible and cheaper than ever before. I love the fact I always have a library of books on my IPhone and that I can read or download a new book wherever I am. And I no longer have to drive to a bookstore to peruse the latest releases. I can shop wherever and whenever I like.  

Q: What's next for you and Tanner? Will he return?
Yes, Tanner will be returning in a sequel to Killpoint by the end of the year (or, at the latest, early 2014). I had to write at least one more Tanner book as I wanted to resolve a lot of the issues that Killpoint had left open. What happened to Tanner’s parents? Who killed them and why? Is Tanner’s never-ending search vindicated? What does the future hold for his comatose sister, Jade? I have finished the first draft of the sequel which, at the moment, is titled Pump Fake. 
In PumpFake, Tanner is also dragged into the world of professional football when his ex-girlfriend, Liz, asks him to find out who is trying to destroy the career of her current boyfriend, who just happens to be the quarterback for an NFL team. Tanner must enter the world of professional football, in the guise of a player no less, to discover who would want to kill the quarterback. Tanner also discovers that his parents weren’t the only ones murdered in
such a gruesome manner fourteen years ago. He traces the dark steps of the killer, (dubbed Cupid for a reason beyond imagining), which leads to a final revelation that horrifies and angers Tanner to the core of his being.
In Pump Fake, Tanner’s obsession for the truth leads to two mysteries, both linked deeply to the past and both likely to kill him. 
Q: How do you promote your work?
I must admit I am pretty hopeless at promoting my work. I would much rather be actually writing.  My books can be viewed on my website www.michaelbeckbooks.com
I suppose that is one of the main advantages of publishing with a big publishing house; you have someone who is keenly interested in promoting your work.

Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
I have always loved science fiction. My first novel, Shifter, was science fiction. Along with westerns(!), science fiction was my favourite genre growing up. Back then, I lived on a diet of Heinlein, Card and Dickson.  Horror has always appealed to me and I have read everything by King, Koontz and Laymon. The genre is not important to me so long as the main character and story grabs me. 

Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
I think they are great so long as the sidekick doesn’t become a caricature. He has to be believable and real, definitely not indestructible, or he loses credibility. I grew up reading the Spencer novels and so was heavily influenced by them. However, Tanner’s sidekick, Bear, is very different from the norm. Most sidekicks (Pike, Hawk, Win) are often violent, dark characters.  In mine, Tanner is the hot-headed one and Bear is the stabilising influence. Bear is the opposite of the traditional sidekick who tends to have some of these characteristics – single, violent, hot-headed, womaniser. Bear is married, has kids, a normal job and tends to be a calming influence on Tanner. Bear is the voice of reason. I think sidekicks run the risk of becoming one dimensional and therefore boring. By making Bear a more normal, well-rounded person I hope he comes across as more believable and interesting. 

Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?
Good question! The crime writers that first attracted me were Parker, McDonald and Leonard. These days I really like DeMille, Crais, Connolly, Finder and Coben. Of course, strictly speaking, Tanner is not a PI. Technically he is just a Fitness Trainer doing favours! 

Q: Why do you write in this genre?
I enjoy the layers that envelope the stories in this genre. In a good crime thriller you can just keep peeling the layers back. I love the mystery and plotting the twists and turns that the story takes. Often the story takes me down a path I hadn’t planned and I would think, “Where did that come from?” The characters in a good novel write themselves and constantly
Apr 102013
 
James Conway was attached to some really cool TV shows and is now writing crime novels. His first novel, Dead And Not So Buried features Gideon Kincaid, PI. Enough reason for me to interview him.

What makes Gideon Kincaid different from other hardboiled characters?
Gideon is damaged.  He drinks too much.  Has anger management issues.  And has emotionally lost his way. 
Gideon has a rigid code of right and wrong, and that moral compass ultimately drove him to make the biggest mistake of his life -- a mistake that got him kicked off the police force.  Gideon loved being a cop,but only tolerates being a PI.
Gideon is aware of his shortcomings, but seems unable to do anything about them.
Gideon also has a cynical and very funny way of looking at the world. 

How did you come up with the character?
I wanted a complicated hero.  A hero, to be sure.  But one with doubts.  Shortcomings.  And failings.  So I started with a PI who is only a PI because he was forced out of the police department.  A PI with a past that complicated every moment of is present.  A past that he finally has to face and deal with in Dead and Not So Buried.

What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
I love it.  I was an early adopter of the Kindle and now read almost exclusively on it.  I'm also excited by the prospect of writers being able to self-publish electronically and take total control of the publishing process. 

What's next for you and Gideon? Will he return?
I'm currently writing Gideon's next adventure.  It's called Scream Queen.   A beautiful B-movie star who specializes in horror movies is threatened and hires Gideon to protect her at a Las Vegas Horror Movie Convention

How do you promote your work?
A number of ways.  I've done book store signings in a variety of cities.  I'm not Michael Connelly so I don't draw huge crowds, but I get to meet the booksellers and they in turn help  sell the book.
I've done writing seminars at a few stores and that has been very successful.
I've been on panels at Thrillerfest and Bouchercon.
I've done a few newspaper and blog interviews.
And I've taken ads in a number of Kindle websites such as Kindle Nation Daily and Ebooks Habit. 

What other genres besides crime do you like?
I love thrillers.  Lee Child, Andrew Klavan, Roger Smith and Don Winslow are some of my favorites.  And adventure novels.  I like Clive Cussler, James Rollins and Boyd Morrison a lot. 

What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
I love those guys.  They are basically psychopaths, but they are good, moral psychopaths.  Efficient and deadly.  They do the dirty work we all wish we could do. 

In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett,
 then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?
I think one of the best, freshest voices writing right now is Don WInslow.  Dawn Patrol is friggin brilliant.   And Michael Connelly has raised the procedural to new heights with his Harry Bosch novels.

Why do you write in this genre?
Because I love it.  Simply put, I want to write what I like to read.
By the way, my second novel, Sexy Babe was just published.  It's a stand alone.  A funny, sexy, Hollywood thriller about an actress who has a very bad day and suddenly finds her self running for her life.   You can check it out at Amazon.
Mar 272013
 



JL Abramo is one of those great writers who is making a comeback via Down & Out books and that's a perfect reason to interview him about his PI Jake Diamond and his feelins about our favorite genre...

Q: What makes Jake Diamond different from other hardboiled characters?
I have always described Diamond as a private eye more over easy than hardboiled, albeit living in a hardboiled world.  He usually counts on others to do the muscle work. However, in Counting to Infinity, the third book in the series, Jake is moved by events to do some damage and he needs to be reined in by his friends and colleagues.  Another less than common Diamond characteristic is that Jake is an avid reader, always with a classic literature paperback handy.  And the book he is reading is somehow tied into the plot of the particular Diamond novel;  A Tale of Two Cities in Catching Water in a Net, The Count of Monte Cristo in Clutching at Straws, and The Brothers Karamazov in Counting to Infinity.

Q: How did you come up with the character?
The character came about very organically.  I wanted to try writing first person, and a private eye seemed like the perfect vehicle.  I have always been drawn to the smart narratives of Raymond Chandler.  Diamond’s personality grew out of my interest in including a good amount of humor in the narrative.  Jake’s background, the son of an Italian-Catholic/Russian-Jewish couple in Brooklyn, New York was based on personal background; as is his background as a less than idolized film actor.

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
When St. Martin’s Press discontinued the series, and the original hardbacks went out-of-print, I thought that Jake Diamond was destined for a ride into the sunset.  Their decision was based purely on economics; the three books had earned very positive feedback from reviewers and fans.  Then Down & Out Books reached out to me.  The folks at D&O admired the work and wanted to get it out there again.  So D&O quickly brought Jake back in eBook format and gave him and J. L. Abramo a second shot.  And since, the new crime novel Gravesend has been released both digitally and as a trade paperback.  I recently ran into a friend I hadn’t seen for awhile, at an airport; we were both heading out to different destinations.  We had a few minutes to catch up, and she said she needed something to read on the plane and downloaded one of my books to her Kindle in a matter of seconds.  Personally, nothing can replace the feel of a printed book in my hands; but eBooks have made literary works less expensive and more easily accessible to readers.  So, yes, I like the revolution and am glad to be part of it

Q: What's next for you and Diamond?
I have two new books ready for editing.  One is a prequel to Catching Water in a Net which features Jimmy Pigeon, the PI who brought Jake into the business.  The second is a new Diamond installment that picks up where Counting to Infinity left off; and finds Jake reading The Hunchback of Notre Dame.  We are shooting to have one or the other ready for ThrillerFest in July and Bouchercon in September, in both print and eBook format.

Q: How do you promote your work?
My website, www.jlabramo.com; social networking like Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and BookPulse, http://www.facebook.com/jlabramo#!/jlabramo/app_278592948831507; guest blogging and interviews, promotional post cards, book signings and readings, annoying emails, and any other way possible.

Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
Science fiction, fantasy, and the occasional western.

Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
I like the edge that Hawk and Pike contribute to the works of Robert B. Parker and Robert Crais.  Mouse Alexander in Walter Mosely’s Devil in a Blue Dress is, in my humble opinion, one of the most entertaining crime fiction characters of all time.

Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett,
     then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the
     coming generation?
I believe that Conan Doyle, Chandler and Hammett will always have a profound influence on PI writers.  There is a lot of very good crime fiction coming out of Scandinavia, both PI and otherwise.  Writers like the late Stieg Larsson, Jo Nesbo, and Henning Mankell, who were certainly victim to American and British influences, have innovated the genre and will perhaps turn the tables and inspire new direction to their contemporaries in the United States and  Great Britain.                                  

Q: Why do you write in this genre?
I discuss the subject more extensively in my blog Why Crime at http://jlabramo.blogspot.com/2012/12/why-crime.html .  The short answer is that I have always been particularly fond of the genre, and I came to discover that it served my purposes as a writer most effectively.

Feb 282013
 
The Hard Bounce is one of my favorite debut novels ever... So, it is a delight for me to interview its author, founder of Thuglit.com, Todd Robinson. 

Q: What makes Boo Malone different from other hardboiled characters?
 Well, the first thing that I think makes Boo different is his career-choice as a bouncer…which isn't much of a career at all. He has a job, but it's not one that I'd seen before in crime fiction for a main character. He has no experience in a professional capacity as an ex-cop or ex-military—which we tend to see a lot of in the genre. He lives on a fatalistic fringe that we don't see in a lot of hardboiled characters. He has no big goals and dreams, he just gets by. He's not a tough guy simply for the sole reason of stating his toughness. His toughness is an extension of his survival mechanism and he carries all the scars from a life that has made him so. But I also needed him to retain the humor that is another aspect of the survival mechanism that I've experienced from some of the most damaged people I've been blessed to have in my own life. For them, you learn to laugh at shit—and laugh very hard—or you eat a bullet well before middle age. The toughest guys I've ever known are also the funniest. Real tough guys don't fucking advertise.

Q: How did you come up with the character?
 Honestly? For the most part, Boo's voice and reactions are my own in a slightly different world—one in which I'm braver, better with women, am in better shape and have more hair. There are certain situations that have arisen in my own life that I've taken for Boo and Junior's adventures, but went with a "what if?" added on. THE HARD BOUNCE was a matter of "What if I were charged with the task of finding a runaway?" Where would I start? How would I go about getting from point A to B?

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
 Like it or not, it's where it's all headed. I think there will always be a market for paper and ink, but I think that fewer and fewer writers are going to get the opportunity to hold their books within their hands, to smell that ink on paper, for much longer. I consider myself blessed that I got to. I'm still a bit of a Luddite as far as how I choose my reading instruments.

 Q: What's next for you and Malone?
 I'm working on the follow-up, ROUGH TRADE, in which Boo and Junior find themselves on the run after accidentally getting themselves accused of a hate crime. And lord knows, I hope you'll get to read it. THE HARD BOUNCE was a one-and-done contract. I have no publisher lined up for book number two. And if enough people don't dig THE HARD BOUNCE, then that's unfortunately going to be it for Boo and Junior.
It took me ten years to get THE HARD BOUNCE onto shelves. If nobody wants the second, I don't know if I have it in me to fight for another decade. I was in the middle of writing a horror/noir novel when Tyrus Books bit on THE HARD BOUNCE. I was at the end of my rope as a crime writer, and I know how incredibly fucking lucky I am to not only have it published, but for all the love that the book and characters have received from readers.

Q: How do you promote your work?
 Internet and a limited book tour—which is basically trying to make appearances in stores that'll have me and those that I can afford to get to. Let's face it, promoting…realpromoting…means money. That's just business for ya. And brudda? I ain't got none. Again, counting my blessings for all the support that the book has been getting from other writers and those that have read it.

 Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
 Probably 90% of what I read is crime. Other than that, I read a little bit of everything.


Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
 I don't know if they're all psychotic, or if some just have a looser moral code than our heroes. Part of what I set out to do with the world of Boo and Junior was have main characters that in other books might have been the emergency hardcore back-ups. Who do those guys call when they're in need? That was where I brought in my character of Twitch. Twitch is the least tough guy in a world populated with thick necks and calloused knuckles. He has no straight-up skills like martial arts or any other training—nothing but a complete lack of moral code towards those who are trying to hurt his friends. None whatsoever. I tried to flip the dynamic a little bit with that.


Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?
 I have no idea. I really don't. They might not be published yet, or if they are, the audience might not have found them yet. Big market books tend not be anything much on the "new and different" side. Publishers tend not to risk publishing new and unique voices. It's just the nature of the business. the word "NEW" is scary to business people. And publishers are business people. For years, I had editors telling me how much they enjoyed the novel, only to have it struck down in marketing. And I don't think I'm re-inventing the wheel or anything here. Is my voice different? I sure as fuck hope so. Am I starting a fucking revolution? Um…no.
 Maybe it was all the cursing…
 
Q: Why do you write in this genre?
 I don't think I have a choice. It's just the kind of stories I tell. Years ago, a friend told me a heartwarming tale about her father's pharmacy and his Christmas generosity. I tried to turn that into a short story, and it wound up being a botched heist tale about a one-legged crackhead. I have no idea why my brain works the way it does.
 I have issues.

Q&A: David Corbett

 Books, Q and A  Comments Off
Feb 042013
 

My friend David Corbett is a writer of marvelous crime fiction; see my review of his most recent novel, Do They Know I’m Running? David’s latest book is something different. The Art of Character draws on his experience as a writing teacher and focuses explicitly on characterization. Read excerpts of the book at Zyzzyva and Narrative Magazine – but after you read this VKDCQ&A.

Q. What can you tell us about THE ART OF CHARACTER?

Gee, thanks for narrowing it down. Short answer: Too much.

It’s a book that grew out of my teaching and my own writing in answer to a need I felt. Everything’s ramped up these days, the speed of life never seems to decelerate, people’s attention span is nil, and this is reflected in our stories.

Pacing is more important than ever, plot is king, “high concept” (the greatest misnomer in lit) still commands the biggest paydays, and I just felt this need to stop, take a deep breath, and say: What’s missing? And what’s missing is character.

When you emphasize story and plot as heavily as we do now, characters can easily gravitate to roles at best, tropes or stereotypes at worst – Always Second Best, Captain Oblivious, Evil Jesuit – and this creates characters based on ideas, not people.

To get to the level of awareness and imagination where you can create the kinds of characters a reader or audience never forgets, you have to take time. The process of creation and discovery, the back and forth between letting the imagination run free then bending it to your will – this all takes a quieter, more patient – more loving for lack of a better word – mindset.

I wrote The Art of Character to begin a dialog on getting back to a more patient, human brand of storytelling.

Q. Quoting from the book, on writing: “This is not a science. It’s barely a craft.” That being the case, how do you even begin writing a how-to?

You accept the fact that you can’t merely instruct, you have to inspire. (I cringe at the phrase “how-to,” by the way.)

The most crucial aspect of characterization will always take place within each writer’s imagination and heart. I tried very hard to elevate the style and tone of this book so that readers would never think they were reading a manual. I can only point you in the right direction, I can’t lead you there.

But pointing you in the right direction is no small thing. The difference between a novice writer and a more experienced one lies in the knowledge of what questions to ask. The Art of Character is basically an encyclopedia of probing questions, with examples of excellent answers provided by great writers. Plus a few decent tips, pithy anecdotes, and jokes.

Q. You’ve said you were motivated to write the book in part because so many writing texts focus on structure as opposed to character. Are there additional demands in balancing structure and character in genre fiction?

The irony is that structure serves to illuminate character. The two are inextricably linked. But if you start with structure, you can often see character solely in its role as serving the demands of plot, premise, theme, and so on. This again steers you toward characters as ideas, not people.

Since genre fiction is so story-centric, the problem gets amplified there. It’s not just world-weary cops, politicians on the take, and hookers with a heart of gold that are clichés. It’s hard to envision new characters in a well-worn format. But that’s the job – especially in genre writing. The pursuit of romance or justice is pretty much the same as it always has been. The great writers find a way to bring someone new, someone we’ve never seen before, into that arena, and convince us they belong.

Q. The book’s subtitle is Creating Memorable Characters for Fiction, Film and TV. You regularly use films like CHINATOWN and MICHAEL CLAYTON in your teaching. How big an influence has film been on your work?

I use films for teaching tools because it’s more likely the whole class will have seen a given film than read a given book. (And it’s easier to teach structure with films because they’re so tightly plotted, especially in Hollywood these days.)

But for some of the same reasons I cited earlier, I think that the demands of TV and film writing – especially tight deadlines and the need to please very broad audiences – make deep character work particularly hard. And so it gets fobbed off on the actors.

Instead, from the writers you get – at the risk of repeating myself – Always Second Best, Captain Oblivious, and Evil Jesuit (which are the names of character types taken from the website TV Tropes). I’m modestly hoping to swing the conversation back a little toward character.

To do that, you have to show that great characters have created some of the greatest stories – if not all the greatest stories. Chinatown and Michael Clayton being two good examples.

Q. What effect has this golden age in long-form television had on characterization? Has it made anti-heroes more palatable? Are there dangers of formula there, too?

Long-form television has in many ways replaced the novel as a narrative medium, which is good for character (bad for all but a few novelists). Characters are allowed to be more complex, more open-ended, less rigidly defined by role. And yeah, that’s a boon for anti-heroes.

Wherever you have tight deadlines, a broad fan base, and a lot of money on the line, you’re going to have the risk of formula. The great lie of capitalism is that people with money are risk takers. Money abhors risk. Adam Smith said that. He just forgot to write it down.

Q. What can we expect next from you?

Well, my whole fiction backlist has been prettied up and reissued by Open Road Media and Mysterious Press, with a brand new story collection titled Killing Yourself to Survive. You can check out the books by following the links.

I’m also working on a new novel I’ve almost finished and intend to complete as soon as all the rest of this brouhaha settles down.

Jazz Q. You were lucky enough to attend the inaugural concert at the San Francisco Jazz Center last month. Highlights?

Oh geez, there were dozens. But the two that stand out for me were, first, a duet between Esperanza Spalding (bass and vocals) and Eric Harland (drums) that was unlike anything I’ve ever seen or heard. It reminded you that jazz is a great art form because it’s based on the players listening to each other, giving to each other, not sticking to a chart. And second, Joe Lovano and Joshua Redman played a post-bop sax duet that was just stinging hot – it growled and got angry and cried like a baby. Or maybe that was me.

Baseball Q. You live in the Bay Area and root for the San Francisco Giants. Any strong feelings about the Oakland A’s?

I was happy to see them make the playoffs, but I’ve got to admit they were largely off my radar until late August.

Embarrassment of riches, being a sports fan in the Bay Area. Almost makes up for the Raiders.

Movie Q. You spent many years working as a private investigator. What movie offers the most accurate depiction of that profession?

That’s much easier to answer for TV, actually. The Rockford Files was pretty decent, but Terriers stole my black little heart.

At the risk of repetition, Chinatown and Michael Clayton (he’s a lawyer, but his job isn’t far from a PI’s) are both pretty good. (As Jake points out to Evelyn Mulwray, most days aren’t as rough as the ones she’s around for.) The Conversation is based on Hal Lipset, who was the granddaddy of San Francisco PIs, and it has that frisson of authenticity.

But the most accurate portrayal of a PI in film or TV was Paul Drake on Perry Mason. Hands down. He was a little thick, but I recognized his job.

Cocktail Q. You’re in a well-stocked bar. What do you order?

Three ounces El Jimador tequila reposado, one ounce Cointreau, one ounce each of Meyer lemon juice and guanabana nectar, shaken not blended, salt on request. It’s how we do our margaritas at Casa de Corbett.
 Posted by at 7:57 pm
Jan 302013
 
Seeley James runs an interesting site and writes about a really cool female protagonist. All good reasons to have him over for an interview...


Q: What makes Pia Sabel different from other hardboiled characters?
The common hardboiled character leans on the literary adage to “give ’em a limp or an eye patch” for sympathy. Pia defies that easy sentiment in the tradition of Batman and Ironman, she is a wealthy international soccer star with many resources and no “affected” problems. Her athletic prowess helps her run down bad guys and her wealth gives her the means to do it. But she’s not without a tragic background, pieces of which I reveal in the first three books.

Q: How did you come up with the character?  
When I was nineteen, young, naïve and single, I adopted a three year old girl and raised her. Her strength and determined attitude impressed me more than the literary heroes we read today. I wanted to tell her story in an idealized venue. But how?
Heroes are a dime a dozen and recently Hollywood turned to heroines for new material. Most of the newest offerings have little realism. In many cases, a modern heroine is a diminutive woman who fearlessly takes on massive, steroid-pumped men with her bare hands. Physics dictates a woman would not fare well in those situations. I wanted to present a heroine with a realistic background and the physical presence to make it work. Woven into that is the abject fear that battle-hardened veterans of Afghanistan tell me is ever present in real conflict. If I’ve achieved my goal, you will find a strong willed, physically capable athlete, scared to death but determined to win.

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
Your question brings up two interpretations, ebooks/ereaders and independent publishing. I’ll answer them both.
I’m a hardcover fan. I love autographed first editions and have large stacks of them lying around the house. However, I find myself turning to my aging Kindle Touch more and more because of its highlighting and dictionary features. The thing makes itself useful and has been growing on me because of that fact alone. In fact, I’m considering a Nexus 7 or 10 now. (I’ve had enough of Apple’s proprietary architecture.)
The ebook revolution in publishing is a terrific development for readers. Traditional publishers have done a terrific job of bringing us high quality literature but, because of the financial pressures of big business, they’ve stuck to tried and true formulas in tried and true genres. Nothing new & different on their shelves. Amazon’s desktop publishing system has opened the doors to authors like myself who might fit into a genre but lead with a character too far from the ‘formula’ for traditional publishers. Indie authors have brought out great new products that otherwise would never have seen a bookshelf. I’m referring to originals like Hugh Howey’s WOOL or Kelly Thompson’s The Girl Who Would Be King … and The Geneva Decision.

Q: What's next for you and Sabel?
 I’m currently working on a serialized novel. My plan is to offer one full novel and one 5 part serial-novel per year. The serial is called “Trench Coats” and has funny bits strewn into a tale of deep political intrigue. I’ve just started this experiment, and will need to see the first installment develop a following before continuing, but I feel good about it and am giving it everything I’ve got. I hope readers like it. The second full novel, The Borneo Decision, is outlined and ready to spill out onto paper after I finish two of the five serials.

 Q: How do you promote your work?
 I do a lot of advertising but don’t want to continue that much longer. I believe advertising puts your title in front of readers, but ultimately, it is the recommendation of other readers that matters. If you write exceptionally well, you will win awards, but if you write a great story, people will read it and recommend it to others. With a little luck and some divine intervention, I’ve written a compelling story. So, right now I am trying to get it into people’s hands in the hopes they like it enough to recommend it.

 Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
 I read a lot of how-to-write books and other non-fiction about the craft and business. I’ve also read a lot of history and biography, but I’ve turned to thrillers in recent years and just love them. Good writers can hide a bit of humor, philosophy, and education in a good thriller. But the last ten books I’ve read are thrillers. And the next ten will be as well. Within that wide genre, I’ve discovered the great indie authors I mentioned earlier, who have pushed the genre into a dynamic shape, encompassing crime, comics, thrillers, science, and many other sub-genres. Indies are making it fun.

 Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
 I like sidekicks but find they often come from a predictable mold. Pia Sabel’s sidekick is a beautiful party girl, completely irreverent and unreliable--until the shooting starts. Then she takes out all her pain and anguish on the poor sod who unwisely tried to kill her or her boss. I’ve noticed more authors are creating characters who are loners, in the vein pioneered by Lee Child. While I love Jack Reacher, who always works alone, I think everyone needs someone to pull them out of a mess now and then.  And since mine is a heroine, and we know women can’t even go to the bathroom alone, I decided she had to have a sidekick.
                                                                                   
Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?  
Chandler, Hammett, et al did such a great job the genre is near the point at which westerns exited the public stage. Once you’ve reached a level of perfection, where do you go? I perceive a public reaction leaning that way. How do you follow Chinatown? That means the influencers today are keeping those Hammett/Chandler traditions but adding new situations and using new devices.
The most influential writer today is Lee Child. He moved us beyond the PI and into the guy who simply finds evil and kills it. The story is laid bare that way, no artificial constructs to help us get to the plot. The hero walks into a bar, observes a nukes-for-beer exchange in progress, kills the traders and all the cowardly patrons who stood idly by, and leaves. Problem solved. Clean and simple story telling. And it reads like a hardboiled crime story. That’s now, what’s next?
After 9-11 a lot of anti-terrorist writers entered the scene. The killing of Osama bin Laden did for them what the Fall of the Berlin Wall did for the spy genre. The war might not be over, but the ready-made stereo-type is receding from the public mind. I think many of those authors will convert to the Lee Child method with less terrorism and more purity of story. Pia Sabel is different but similar to Jack Reacher. When she finds wrong, she sets it right. Despite being an agnostic, she believes in the parable of the Good Samaritan -- whenever she finds someone who needs help, she drops everything to help them, even if that means beating the crap out of somebody. (I’m not sure Jesus would have approved of her body-count, but Pia will deal with that on judgment day :)
As for who will influence after Lee Child, I hope it will be Kelly Thompson. She’s a comic book fan who wrote a novel about a crime fighting heroine. While the roots are decidedly comic book, her interpretation is much deeper. She pulled some interesting background and added a funny and tragic villain. With so many Hollywood franchises evolving from comic books these days, I think she’s on to something. Check it out, The Girl Who Would Be King. But I’ll warn you: no matter what you expect, you won’t expect this story. Every page is a new experience.

Q: Why do you write in this genre? 
I love the look of faces entranced by a story—especially when it’s a story I’m telling.
I believe all great authors live with that same desire to keep people spellbound, from Dickens to Stevenson to Steinbeck to Child. Different generations respond to different stimuli. Our modern world is relatively safe from disease and war and wolves and artful dodgers, and is somewhat dull in terms of the daily adrenaline rush our ancestors endured. That means the modern reader would not believe Oliver Twist (they want to believe the foster care system is preventing such tragedies). Today’s readers want to fall out of an airplane, swim out of the raging river, disarm extortionists carrying sawed-off shotguns, race through Amsterdam and Albuquerque chasing mad bombers, and save babies tossed to crocodiles in the Nile. And so I write in the genre that modern readers find thrilling.
I want to imagine their faces staring wide-eyed while they rip through the pages. So I write thrillers.
Jan 272013
 
With the success of Lee Child, more and more writers gives us protagonists who are just a bit more military than most PI's (like my own Mike Dalmas). They still come from the Sam Spade tradition, being hardboiled loners fighting for justice. Jason Dean is one of these writers with his cool James Bishop series. I was lucky enough to interview him...


Q: What makes James Bishop different from other hardboiled characters?
For a start, he’s not a private investigator. Nor is he someone with a history in law enforcement. In fact, he’s got a particular dislike of cops in general, which is kind of
understandable once you’ve read The Wrong Man. And he doesn’t have a stock cast of associates or friends that he can fall back on whenever a particular problem comes
up, either. He’s just a former Marine who entered the close protection business after his discharge and quickly discovered he was better at his job than everybody else.
Unfortunately, that career comes to a violent end in the first few pages of the book, whereupon the next phase of his life begins.

Q: How did you come up with the character?
It was a fairly gradual process, really. After coming up with the basic plot of The Wrong Man, I began to develop the kind of hero I wanted to put not only into this story, but
all the others I had vague plans about for the future. For instance, I wanted him to be self-reliant, taciturn and methodical, with an unbending sense of right and wrong. And
I also wanted him to have a less than positive attitude to law enforcement types, don’t ask me why. Then I just made lots of notes, essentially creating Bishop’s entire history
from childhood onwards, chipping away at the marble and honing his character until he was standing in front of me, ready to leap into action.

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
Hey, if it opens more people up to reading that’s cool with me. It’s also making things a whole lot easier for debut authors to get their work across to the public, which can
only be a good thing. But it’s still got a long way to go in regards to gatekeeping and quality control. After all, editors do exist for a reason. So while I can see ePublishing
becoming the norm in the long term, I think it’ll continue to co-exist with print publishing for some time yet. They don’t have to be mutually exclusive, do they? Besides, I
still prefer to read hard copies, myself.

Q: What's next for you and Bishop?
Well, the second Bishop novel, Backtrack, has just been published and is on the shelves as we speak. And I’ve already submitted the third book, The Hunter’s Oath, to my
editor and that should be out before the end of the year, all being well. I’m currently about halfway through writing the fourth novel, which I’m calling The Long Run. Then
once that’s done (hopefully in a couple of months), I’ll take a short breather before figuring out what’s next in store for Bishop.

Q: How do you promote your work?
At the moment, it’s mainly by doing interviews with crime and thriller bloggers such as your good self. I’ve also got a Facebook page for Bishop, which my publishers and I
update whenever we can. I was also invited to my first crimefest last year (at Harrogate), which is a fantastic way to get your name out there and meet readers and fellow
authors alike.

Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
Well, I’ve always been a sucker for a good thriller (crime or otherwise), but other than that I rarely choose a book because of its genre. I’ll simply pick up anything that I find
interesting. For example, I find Chuck Palahniuk has an innate talent for coming up with plots and situations that grab me from the word go. And although I got horror
fiction out of my system long ago, I still read just about anything Stephen King puts out. I also read plenty of non-fiction too. As a long-term film buff I’m always on the
lookout for decent books that focus on particular directors like Kubrick or Frankenheimer, or actors like Mitchum or Brando. You can’t beat the old greats.

Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
I think it’s a fine concept, although there’s always that danger that the character will go on to outshine the hero. Just look at Joe Pike. Speaking for myself, I much prefer the
Pike solo stories to the ones where he’s playing support to Cole, which is probably not something Robert Crais would like to hear. And for that reason, I don’t think I’d be
interested in writing that kind of character myself. I write Bishop as a fairly reasonable guy most of the time, but he never has any trouble accessing the lizard part of his
brain if the situation demands it.

Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the
coming generation?

That’s a hard one. Personally, I think Hammett will always be at the top of this kind of list as he pretty much set the standard for everybody that came after (and since your
site goes by the title of ‘Sons of Spade,’ I can only assume you’re sympathetic to that viewpoint). But I don’t think present-day authors necessarily need to be writing in the
crime genre to influence the next generation of crime writers. These days, we all borrow a little something from here, a little something from there, with little regard to what
genre it’s a part of. Cross-pollination, yeah?

Q: Why do you write in this genre?
Simple answer. I write the kind of books I’d want to read myself. And I like reading thrillers best of all. Ergo…
Jan 232013
 

Here's an interview with Brad Strickland, the man writing the Jim Dallas mysteries as Ken McKea...

Q: What makes Jim Dallas different from other hardboiled characters?
Dallas is hardboiled but vulnerable. He’s dealing with PTSD and with his own demons as he takes on cases—actually, to an extent, Dallas is gradually solving the mystery of Dallas as he works on the various problems that he investigates.  I have an arc for thirteen books, and after that…who knows? Never say never.

Q: How did you come up with the character?
My late friend and cowriter Thomas E. Fuller (he and I collaborated on YA novels, a mystery novel, and the Lovecraftian novel The Dancer in the Dark) complained once that he was in the mood to read a John D. MacDonald Travis McGee novel. I said that would be difficult, since he had died some years before. The next week Tom emailed me with the idea for a Jim Dallas novel—Dallas because Travis was originally intended to be Dallas McGee.
 We outlined Dallas’s biography and came up with backstory (some of which has appeared, some of which will eventually come out). We wanted a straight-arrow sort of guy who becomes hardened and rather cynical when his efforts result in pain and tragedy for him. His neighbor, friend, and investigative assistant Sam Lyons is physically based on Tom, by the way, who always dreamed of having a home on the Florida coast and not having to wear coats and ties! I have relatives who are in police work and we did some research into that end of things. By the time we’d finished, we had a pretty good sense of Dallas, his drives, his fears, and his behaviors.
 We kicked the idea around and outlined a plot, but then got a contract to do six YA books in a little over a year and so Dallas went on the back burner. Sadly, the next year Tom passed away from a sudden heart attack. In 2011 I dug out and completed The Dancer in the Dark and came upon the outline material for Atlanta Bones, wrote the book from that, and attached the pen name Ken McKea to it. Tom and I were known as YA writers—we did over a dozen “Wishbone” books about public TV’s literature-hungry Jack Russell Terrier—and out thought was that we would “brand” the Florida thrillers with a distinctive pseudonym.
Once I had finished the first novel, I quickly went on to the second and third. Fourth one is brewing now.

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
It frees the writer from having to look constantly over his shoulder at the editor. Editors are not the natural enemies of writers, but they do tend to be a bit conservative in my experience—“You can’t write that because nothing like that has been written.” I’m hoping that eBooks will continue to give writers the opportunity to make a name for themselves. It’s like what Sid Caesar used to say about the vanishing Catskills comedy places: “There’s no place to fail any more.” Certainly most writers would like to have a home in hardcovers, but it’s hard to get through that particular door in these economic times. For me, a writer has to have an audience of some kind before anything else, and e-publishing is certainly one way of doing that.

Q: What's next for you and Dallas?
The next story, the fourth, will deal with a long-ago unsolved theft and with missing money. It’s going to hit the ground running—the opening will be action-oriented, not the slow wade into the plot of the first three. This one marks a kind of turning point in that what starts as a polite brush-off by Dallas when a request for help doesn’t appeal to him becomes a vendetta as he is injured and angered. In dealing with solving the case, he’s going to make a small beginning on confronting the sour, corrosive streak of anger he has repressed for years now. And of course Sam is going to be along for the ride, as is an alligator who I think will bear the endearing name of “Clutch.”

 Q: How do you promote your work?
 Twitter and Facebook and word of mouth! Amazon.com also has been publicizing the first three novels—I can tell when they do an emailing about mysteries because there’ll be a little bump in Kindle sales. I also am looking for bloggers who’d like to review the danged things!

 Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
Pirate novels (my favorite novel as a kid, and I still like re-reading it, is Treasure Island). Science-fiction, fantasy, and horror. And, oddly, Victorian novels. I’ve read all of Dickens, all of Jane Austen, all of the Brontës, all of Trollope, and about half of Thackeray. Many of the conventions of Victorian fiction don’t appeal to me (the constant authorial intrusion and editorializing, the whopping coincidences), but I do like the in-depth character development that the best of those writers were able to produce.

Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
 They’ve got their place, certainly. They add an element of unpredictability and instability that can gun up a plot. However, I’ve had my share of contact with actual psychotics, and I’m a little leery about introducing a recurring psychotic character in my own stuff!

 Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?
 Lee Child, I think—he’s all over the place. And I think some of the women writers already are producing literary imitators—Tess Gerritsen, Kathy Reichs, Sue Grafton. Interestingly (to me) when I read Grafton’s first mystery I got a little bit misty because she uses “Santa Teresa” as a setting—taken from Ross Macdonald’s Lew Archer series. When I was in college, I corresponded with Macdonald, who encouraged my writing. It was good to see he’d encouraged someone else who carried on the torch.

 Q: Why do you write in this genre?
Well, when I talk about creative writing to beginners, I almost always advise “Write the book that you’d like to read.” I like to read Florida thrillers—MacDonald, of course, and Carl Hiaasen, Randy Wayne White, Tom Corcoran, James W. Hall, many others—and I like to write them. I love visiting Florida, where my daughter lived for a good many years, and, hey, if you can spend two weeks on the beach and do some walkabouts for local color, you can write part of the trip off on your tax return as research.
Ken Millar (Ross Macdonald) wrote in a letter to me something like this: “The tension in a detective story is between the secrets of the past and the truth of the present. If well handled, one can comment on the other and enrich the work.”
I believe that. Primarily, the Jim Dallas series is about Jim—but it’s also about crime and culture, about the intersection of idealism and temptation, about the hold of the past on the hope of the future. You can deal with what Macdonald called “radioactive material” in a detective novel, and in doing so you can try to make some small kind of sense out of the fragmented and sometimes terrifying world we live in.
And if you’re Sam Lyons, you can wear a Hawaiian shirt while doing so.
Jan 162013
 
MD Grayson writes about a PI that has a few things in common with my own Noah Milano. He's younger than most AND has been influenced by Patrick Kenzie who was the biggest influence on Noah as well (see the intro to Tough As Leather).
So, of course I just HAD to interview him...


Q: What makes Danny Logan different from other hardboiled characters?
Danny’s not so “hardboiled” as most of the others.   I think he’s not “wound so tightly” as some of his contemporary fictional PI’s.  Don’t misunderstand, he’s a serious guy and when he’s “on”, he’s all business and I guess this serious side of him makes him “hard boiled”.  But he also knows how to have a good time.  He camps, he plays guitar, he listens to music.  After all, Danny’s just turned thirty years old and he’s smart enough to recognize that you only go around once.  He doesn’t let his work consume him.  I suspect this might have something to do with his laid-back Seattle upbringing.

He’s careful to  take care of himself and he doesn’t have any physical ailments.  He’s been a competitive long distance runner since before high school.  Unlike many of his fictional contemporaries, he doesn’t smoke or do drugs or even drink to excess.  He’s a good-looking guy, but he’s no ladies’ man.  In fact, he’s a little shy and he’s not very comfortable around women.   (Toni’s helping him here).

His time in the military was a very influential part of his life, but he seldom mentions it – it makes him uncomfortable on several levels.  To be sure, he had some very difficult war-time experiences.  He doesn’t forget them, but he doesn’t dwell on them either.

Emotionally, still a young man and he’s still growing.  He’s opinionated and a bit judgmental and he sometimes jumps to conclusions, despite knowing that doing so often leads to mistakes.  As a result, he sometimes has to backtrack.  Like many PI’s, Danny has a strong sense of right and wrong and he can get downright belligerent when pushed too far.  He learns every day and, being only thirty, he’s got a lot of learning to do.


Q: How did you come up with the character?
I’d say my three main influences for Danny Logan were Dennis Lehane’s character, Patrick Kenzie (although clearly Kenzie lives in a much “grittier” world than Danny Logan) combined with a little of John D. MacDonald’s Travis McGee (McGee is even more introspective than Danny) combined with a pinch of Bruce Willis’ character David Addison from the old Moonlighting series (alas, neither Logan nor I are nearly as witty as Addison).   My thought was to combine these basic personas and wrap it up in a “northwest” package.  Then, I wanted to pair Danny with an ensemble cast, particularly with a woman who in many ways was his opposite – thus, Antoinette “Toni” Blair.  Whereas Logan is a bit introverted, Toni is an extrovert (as evidenced by her tattoos). Logan is comfortable every day in his Jeep with his jeans and a Hawaiian shirt. Toni – despite her leanings towards Seattle grunge, occasionally likes to “make an entrance”.  And, she’s good at it.   They share a passion for PI work, though and they’re both committed to making Logan PI a success.


Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution? 
 Books for ninety-nine cents!  From the reader’s perspective, what’s not too like?  From an author’s perspective, the idea that a guy like me can share my creative work with a world-wide audience (for better or worse!) is mind-boggling.  For those with talent who are willing to learn the craft and put in the work, this has got to be the best time to be an author.  That said, I’m not sure anyone really knows the full impact eBooks will eventually have on the publishing industry.  I guess we’ll find out when we get there!


Q: What's next for you and Logan?
  I wrote the first three Logan novels in 2012.  Plus, about half of the fourth book before I started getting the nagging feeling that maybe if I slowed the pace down just a little perhaps I could raise the quality of my work (maybe not – we’ll see what the readers have to say).  Anyway, the fourth Logan book will take twice as long as each of the first three – I’m hoping to have it out in the spring time.  It’s a Danny Logan/northwest take on a who-dun-it.  I suppose that at some point, I’ll back off the pace on Logan novels a bit so I can take up some other writing ideas I have as well.  But, as long as people continue to enjoy reading about Danny and Toni and the crew, I’ll keep writing about them.


Q: How do you promote your work?
  Ah – there’s a great question.  The good news is that Amazon has made it very easy to get your book in front of the public.  The bad news is that it seems millions of people have figured this out and are trying to do just that.  That can make it very hard to get your work actually heard.  What’s worse, many of the promotional ideas that worked even a couple of years ago when the ebook revolution was just kicking off have become so diluted that they don’t work so well now, if they still work at all.  Bottom line – I have the standard “social networking” package – Facebook, Twitter, Website/blogsite, and email newsletter.  I actively look for reviewers – readers or bloggers, either way.  And I advertise.  eBook advertising is an evolving science – changing rapidly as the industry emerges.  I have found that most people who want your advertising dollars aren’t able to deliver the results I’d expect.  Those that can deliver are swamped.  Still, I’m always looking for advertising sources that can help me expand my base.  (The world’s #1 selling author is James Patterson.  He used his experience as an advertising guy to launch his first novels with television advertising.  It worked and his career was launched into orbit.  I’m still looking for ways that might accomplish the same thing today.)


Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
  Most all.  I like Thrillers and Spy novels.  I’m a sucker for Romance.  I like Sci-Fi and Fantasy.  I even like Western’s.  I guess about the only thing I don’t read are Para-normal and  Horror novels  (although I occasionally read those as well).


Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?  Sidekicks/supporting cast are very important for a number of reasons.  Having a dark character – even psychotic – can help unload the main character of some of the “dirty” work.  Patrick Kenzie has Bubba Rogowski.  Bubba does things without even thinking that Patrick would never do.  Danny Logan has Doc Kiahtel.  Doc is nowhere near as “conscience-free” as Bubba or Spenser’s Hawk, and he’s certainly no psycho, but I’ve set him up as a sort of uber “tough guy” that Danny can call on when needed.


Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?
  I don’t know but I’ve heard that this M.D. Grayson guy is pretty hot.  Seriously – today, in addition to Lehane, I suppose you’d have to add Connelly, Evanovich, Cornwell, Coban, Grafton, Grisham, maybe Tony Hillerman.  Also, Randy Wayne White and Stuart Woods.  I know all of these people have influenced me.


Q: Why do you write in this genre?
 For me, it’s natural.  I started reading about John D. MacDonald in the summer between middle school grades when I lived in Las Vegas.  It was way hot outside so when I wasn’t in the swimming pool, I liked to spend time inside in the cool air conditioned room and get totally immersed in Travis McGee, the Busted Flush and the hot marinas and even hotter women of  McGee’s south Florida.  Just writing this brings the memories back!  I was hooked and I devoured every McGee novel I could get my hands on.  I kept reading these, along with many others, through high school and beyond.   I was crushed when John D. passed away in 1986 – I was nowhere near ready to stop reading about McGee yet!  I thought about trying to see if the estate would let me continue with the characters but I never pursued this (which was a good thing at the time, believe me!)  Later, my reading broadened into a variety of areas but I always came back to my first love – a good mystery!   Since I was old enough to appreciate what they were saying and doing, I’ve loved PI’s!
Jan 022013
 

One of the most important missions for this blog is introducing you to new writers who love the PI genre. I was thrilled to discover the Frank Boff series written by Nathan Gottlieb and was happy to interview him. The first novel in the series, The Hurting Game is available here in paperback or here for Kindle

Q: What makes Frank Boff different from other hardboiled characters? 
For one thing, he is a very realistic private investigator, warts and all. Somewhat like Michael Connelly’s Lincoln Lawyer, Mickey Haller. As Boff says in my novel: “… and unlike what you see in movies or read in books, one hundred percent of investigators do not take a case for free because they’re noble and believe in truth, justice, and the American way.”
Boff is also unique because he is happily married, has two kids, lives in the suburbs, barbecues on the deck, and watches sitcoms. He is not a drunk. Or a recovering one. He consumes more junk food than any P.I. in history. Boff basically lives in two worlds: his happy suburban family life, and what he calls the “Dark Side,” where his friends include mobsters, snitches, drug dealers, murderers, and other riff raff that he has helped keep out of jail. A softie at home, hardboiled in the underworld. A man of massive contradictions.

Q: How did you come up with the character?
 My P.I. is closely modeled on one of my best friends, Fred, a former crack DEA agent turned high profile private investigator. Fred has told me endless fascinating stories about his days with the agency and his years as a P.I., many of which made their way into “The Hurting Game.” Stuff you just couldn’t make up. Fred is an iconic character, and so is my fictional P.I., unique without being a gimmick character.

Q: What are your thoughts on the whole eBook revolution?
 I think it is the natural evolutionary stage of the publishing business. Traditional publishing is a dinosaur and will eventually fade away, a victim of the Internet, social media, and its own stodgy commitment to doing things the way it’s always been done before. Reminds me of what Dylan said in his song, “The Times They Are A Changing:”

Come gather 'round people
Wherever you roam
And admit that the waters
Around you have grown
And accept it that soon
You'll be drenched to the bone.
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start swimmin'
Or you'll sink like a stone
For the times they are a-changin'.

Q: What's next for you and  Boff?
 Boff returns in The Punishing Game, due out in March. Fate conspires to brings Boff to Brooklyn, where he tangles with the biggest and most ruthless street gang in New York, the Bloods, and finds himself tracking down a killer in a dangerous underworld where powerful people are playing a game of high-stakes poker in order to pull off a multi-million dollar scam.

Q: How do you promote your work? 
First and foremost, I use social media. I am also fortunate to have spent 19 years as a sportswriter in New York, covering the Yankees, Mets, Knicks and Giants. Most of my writer friends from back then are now all major New York columnists. My friends from the NY Times, NY Post, and The Star-Ledger of Newark read and reviewed my novel. I recently contacted the editor of my old newspaper, The Star-Ledger, and he told me they are going to review my book in their Arts & Entertainment section. The Star-Ledger has a daily circulation of 316,280, and 455,699 on Sunday. Wonderful exposure.

Q: What other genres besides crime do you like?
 Thrillers. After a youth spent reading  classic literature, for the last 15 years or so I have read nothing but mysteries and thrillers. Love them. I have read virtually every major thriller writer.

Q: What's your idea about the psychotic sidekick in PI novels like Hawk and Joe Pike?
 First a sacrilegious admission. Even though a couple reviewers have compared me to Robert B. Parker, I have never read one of his books. So I have no opinion about Hawk. I am a big fan of Joe Pike and the Elvis Cole books. I think Pike is a terrific character, a guy comfortable in his own skin, who knows exactly who he is and has core beliefs he doesn’t stray from. He is a less complex version of another favorite character of mine, Jack Reacher. And by the way, I don’t consider Pike psychotic. Psychotics act on impulses they can’t control. Pike does not.

Q: In the last century we've seen new waves of PI writers, first influenced by Hammett, then Chandler, Macdonald, Parker, later Lehane. Who do you think will influence the coming generation?
 I think all of the above will remain influential. I have a young writer friends who love the old masters, even though he is just 29. There are many new writers who, while following the masters, have branched out in their own way. Too many to name. Only time will tell who among the current crop of hardboiled writers will emerge as a major influence on the next generation.

Q: Why do you write in this genre?
 Because at heart I am a storyteller, and nobody tells a story better than hardboiled writers and other mystery novelists. The best writers in this genre, then and now, create characters you can follow to the ends of the earth. I also like this genre because besides telling a great story, the writers capture the essence of time and place, the way Chandler did in using Southern California as a backdrop to his mysteries. Critics have said numerous times that Chandler’s portrait of Southern California exceeds Nathanael West’s classic, The Day of the Locust.

Switch to our mobile site